Archives
February 02, 2015
Column
- New going concern rules
- Is using social media in a hiring decision worth the risk?
- LEGAL PEOPLE
- May it Please the Palate
- LEGAL PEOPLE
Feature
- Wayne Law prof to serve as scholar-in-residence at noted London firm
- A notorious tour
- Sentencing practices need a fresh approach
- Daily Briefs . . .
Courts
Business
- 5 things to know before Obama rolls out his budget Monday
- Decoding the jargon of mutual funds: a look from A to E
- U.S. economy slowed last quarter, but signs are pointing up
- Chocolate Wars
- New going concern rules
- Is using social media in a hiring decision worth the risk?
- Wayne Law prof to serve as scholar-in-residence at noted London firm
- A notorious tour Lawyer publishes book on country's 'Houses of Homicide'
- Illinois Federal prosecutors drop dozens of stash house sting charges Move comes among increasing scrutiny and criticism by federal judges
- Court Roundup
- Politics and Money 5 things to know before Obama rolls out his budget Monday President will call for increasing spending on agency operating budgets by 7 percent
- Of Mutual Interest Decoding the jargon of mutual funds: a look from A to E
- Attorney gets acquitted client's blood samples returned from MSP
- Sentencing practices need a fresh approach
Nation
headlines Detroit
- Michigan Law student receives Institute for Policy Integrity fellowship to work on environmental and energy policy
- DOJ suing Washtenaw County over immigration enforcement
- MPA sounds alarm bells on ongoing threats to transparency
- After court decision, MSP seeking applications for FEMA grant program
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill
