Archives
April 15, 2015
Feature
Column
- Enhanced knowledge in contested probate matters can prove helpful
- In the U.S., uncertainty drives volatility
- Primary Economics: A Hero(ine)'s Journey (part three)
- Changes to the DSM: Good or bad?
- Changes to the DSM Good or bad?
- Primary Economics: A Hero(ine)'s Journey (part three)
Business
- IMS: US prescription drug spending jumped 13 pct. in 2014
- Parents sue Botox maker after woman with cerebral palsy dies
- American Bar Association honors numerous lawyers with annual awards at April meeting
- Enhanced knowledge in contested probate matters can prove helpful
- Building blocks
- Keyboard crime Cyber security expert offers words of caution
- Vermont Parents sue Botox maker after woman with cerebral palsy dies
- North Carolina @:Police: College shooting possible hate crime; victim was gay Shooter had been recently dismissed from print shop's work-study program
- Supreme Court Watch Gay mentor, belief in dignity at roots of Kennedy's views Kennedy is prohibitive favorite to write same-sex marriage decision
- National Roundup
Nation
- Police: College shooting possible hate crime; victim was gay
- National Roundup
- American Bar Association honors numerous lawyers with annual awards at April meeting
Courts
headlines Detroit
- Zearfoss to deliver Michigan Law commencement address ahead of planned retirement
- War with Iran fails to produce a ‘win’ that U.S and Israel were blindly seeking
- From conferences to certificates, MSU’s Indigenous Law and Policy Center leads the future of Tribal Law
- Business Law Seminar featuring 10 judges slated May 7 in Troy
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Exodus: Thousands of federal lawyers left their jobs by choice or by force in 2025
- Wisconsin moves to UBE to ease access-to-justice woes
- The Burton Book Review: A discussion on ‘When You Come at the King’
- Facebook, Instagram pulling ads from lawyers looking for plaintiffs ... to sue them
- Florida law school pressed to include chapter of Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA
- BigLaw firm faces questions over $35M bill
