––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 18, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court rescinds proposed legal solicitation amendment
![](/Content/LegalNews/images/article_db_image1.jpg)
By Roberta M. Gubbins
Legal News
The Michigan Supreme Court recently rescinded its order amending Rule 7.3 of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct to add a 30-day prohibition on targeted written solicitations following an injury, death, or accident that may give rise to a claim and require the labeling of letters and circulars, whether targeted or non-targeted, as advertising material.
That order, adopted 4-3, was to have taken effect September 1.
The proposed amendments to Rule 7.3, Direct Contact with Prospective Clients, defines, under the section "prohibited methods of communication," solicit as including contact that is directed to a specific person in person or by telephone or telegraph or by letter or other writing or by other communication.
A lawyer is absolutely prohibited from soliciting work by "written or recorded communication or by in-person or telephone contact if the prospective client" has indicated to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited or the solicitation involves coercion, duress or harassment.
The rule goes on to define what is not solicitation and is thus allowable. Included is a reference to Shapero v Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 486 US 466 (1988) and states that a solicitation sent to a person who may have a potential claim can only be sent 30 days after the injury, death or accident that gave rise to the claim and must contain the words "Advertising Material" on the envelope and at the beginning and ending of the any written communication.
Those words must appear whether the written communication is sent by regular mail, private carrier, electronically or in any other manner.
Comments on the proposed order may be sent to the Supreme Court in writing or electronically by November 1, 2011 at P.O. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909 or MSC_clerk @courts.mi.gov.
The Court welcomes the views of all. This matter also will be considered at a public hearing.
A copy of the proposed order is available at the Michigan Supreme Court website.
Published: Thu, Aug 18, 2011
headlines Jackson County
headlines National
- Judge accused in drive-by shootings has progressive brain disease, court filing says
- Despite lyrics mistake by AI, lawyer wasn’t ineffective for using tech in rapper’s case, federal judge says
- Former Littler lawyer drops California suit against firm, bringing end to departure dispute
- Last-minute election lawsuits may serve political goals, law prof says
- Criticizing plaintiff’s ‘chutzpah,’ federal judge holds lawyer jointly responsible for over $207K in legal fees
- Personal injury firm sues TD Bank after loss in fraud scheme