- Posted September 08, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Can't we all just get along like Supreme Court justices?

By Kimberly Atkins
The Daily Record Newswire
Here in Washington, the partisan divide has never been so palpable. Republicans and Democrats spar openly in the press and on the floors of the House and Senate. The president and the House speaker had a tough time even agreeing on a date for this week's presidential address on jobs, let alone the substance of the speech.
But there is one place in Washington where disagreements are handled civilly: One First Street, NE - the U.S. Supreme Court building.
''We have nine justices who don't always agree, but I've never heard a voice raised in anger in 17 years in that conference room," said Justice Stephen Breyer at the recent ABA conference in Toronto, according to ABC News.
Other justices echoed his sentiment on how nice it is to be a part of the most genteel branch of the federal government. Even when the justices disagree sharply on cases in their written opinions, they leave the tough talk on the paper and ink.
Justice Elena Kagan described the Court as ''incredibly collegial and warm institution'' with good friendships that transcend ''whatever people think of as ideological divides.''
One difference between the justices and their executive and legislative counterparts may explain their civil relationship: they are lifelong appointees. Kagan said Chief Justice John G. Roberts pointed this out when he called to congratulate her on her confirmation.
''You know we are going to be serving together for 25 years'' he told her.
Published: Thu, Sep 8, 2011
headlines Washtenaw County
- Webber, Outman renew push to protect patient rights, improve oversight for state psychiatric care
- MSU Law student among MALDEF scholarship recipients
- International Bar Association (IBA) launches podcast series ‘Inspirational Legal Women’
- Law student is a paralegal with the Air National Guard
- AG Nessel and Arizona attorney general launch podcast ‘Pantsuits and Lawsuits’
headlines National
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Judge accused of using ‘game or jail’ tactic, asserting abuse victims get ‘Super Bowl’ neurochemicals
- Prosecutor gets suspension for invading jury’s ‘inner sanctum’
- Lateral hiring bounced back in 2024, especially for associates in BigLaw, new NALP report says
- Refugee ban can’t be enforced against those who received conditional approval, 9th Circuit says
- ABA, more than 50 bar associations condemn ‘government actions that seek to twist the scales of justice’