In an amicus brief filed in Filarsky v. Delia, which the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear this week, the American Bar Association is urging the court to protect the public interest by ruling that outside lawyers hired to do government legal work are entitled to the same immunity from related lawsuits that government employees have.
Steve A. Filarsky, a private lawyer, was retained by the City of Rialto, Calif., to provide labor and employment law guidance in an investigation involving firefighter Nicholas B. Delia.
When Delia later sued the city, its personnel and Filarsky for civil rights violations, all defendants asserted qualified immunity, which the district court granted.
The Ninth Circuit reversed as to Filarsky, concluding that he was not entitled to qualified immunity based on his status as a private lawyer.
The ABA is asking the justices to protect the public interest by overturning the Ninth Circuit’s reversal.
“State and local governments frequently must retain private counsel for the effective and efficient performance of core governmental functions,” the ABA brief states.
Denying qualified immunity to outside lawyers from lawsuits stemming from their government work “would deter them from representing public entities and “significantly impact the vital contributions that private attorneys make to effective government performance,’ the brief states. “On the other hand, ensuring qualified immunity would promote the strong public interest in the continuing representation of public entities by private counsel.”
The brief is available online at www.abanow.org.
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
