- Posted January 26, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Thomas More Law Center appeals to U.S. Supreme Court
The Thomas More Law Center announced that it has appealed a controversial decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to the U.S. Supreme Court. The appeal was filed in the case of Bradley Johnson v. Poway Unified School District late last week.
For the past 25 years, Bradley Johnson, a high school math teacher at the Poway School District located in California had been displaying red, white and blue banners in his classroom that contained patriotic phrases such as: "In God We Trust," "One Nation Under God," and "God Bless America."
He displayed the banners pursuant to a 30-year school district policy that permitted teachers to maintain classroom displays of non-curricular messages that reflected their personal opinions and values.
However, in 2007 school officials ordered Johnson to remove his banners because they promoted a "Judeo-Christian" viewpoint.
School officials, however, allowed other teachers to display non-Christian religious displays in their classrooms, including a 40-foot string of Tibetan prayer flags with images of Buddha hung across a classroom, a poster with Hindu leader Mahatma Gandhi's "7 Social Sins," and a poster of Muslim leader Malcolm X.
As a result, the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which defends the religious liberty of Christians, filed a federal lawsuit against the school district on behalf of Johnson.
On September 4, 2008, Federal District Judge Robert T. Benitez agreed with the Thomas More Law Center. He ruled that "Johnson was simply exercising his free speech rights on subjects that were otherwise permitted in the limited public forum created by Defendants" and that there was an "ongoing violation of his First Amendment free speech rights."
However, the Poway School District appealed the ruling and a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Judge Benitez's decision ruling that the school district was justified in removing banners that mentioned God, while leaving untouched the Tibetan prayer flags and the images of Buddha.
Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Law Center, commented, "This case is a prime example of how public schools across our nation are cleansing our classrooms of our Christian heritage while promoting atheism and other non-Christian religions under the guise of cultural diversity."
Attempts to get a rehearing in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals failed, and so the Law Center pursued an appeal to the United States Supreme Court.
Published: Thu, Jan 26, 2012
headlines Washtenaw County
- Cooley Law School professors part of Accesslex Institute’s initiative to prepare for Nextgen bar exam
- Entrepreneur looks to a career in transactional law
- Wayne Law Professor Noah Hall co-authors a new book on water law policies
- International Court of Justice judge speaks on importance of international law
- Retirement event for Judge Timothy Connors is set for Dec. 30
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition