- Posted March 18, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Who claims the kids?
![](/Content/LegalNews/images/article_db_image1.jpg)
By Marie Matyjaszek
My dog Verdict was born on April 15, so I always remember both her birthday and tax day, which is, of course, the more enjoyable occasion of the two.
When tax day rolls around each year, clients become concerned about who gets to claim their children as an income tax dependency exemption.
It is often a disputed subject during the divorce as the exemption can provide significant financial benefit to a parent.
Since 1985, the IRS mandates that the custodial parent receive the right to claim the child's exemption, unless the custodial parent has voluntarily agreed to release the exemption to the non-custodial parent in writing.
Plenty of parents do agree to alternate the exemption each year if there is just one child, or each parent takes one child if there are two children, etc.
IRS Form 8332, "Release/ Revocation of Release of Claim to Exemption for Child by Custodial Parent," is the form the parent needs to fill out.
Part 1 provides for the release of the exemption for the current year only. Part 2 of the form provides for the release for all future years relative to that child's exemption. Part 3 allows for the revocation of the release of that claim. To check out the form yourself, go to http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8332.pdf.
All of my Judgments of Divorce or other orders incorporating language about the child's income tax exemption require the parents to cooperate and fill out this form. It needs to be filed simultaneously with the non-custodial parent's income tax return. The IRS provides for exceptions to this depending on the date of your judgment or agreement, and if the language complies with what it deems to be "substantially similar to Form 8332."
Another common question that arises is whether or not the client can change the judgment's terms regarding which parent receives the exemption. Well, that depends on what the judgment states.
Per Fear v Rogers, 207 Mich App 642 (1995), the child's tax exemption can be treated as part of the support provisions of the judgment or the property division provisions of a judgment. The Fear court stated that the exemption normally should be considered part of the child support award in a judgment, but the court "was not persuaded that the federal income tax dependency exemption is so intricately related to child support that it would be appropriate to preclude parties to a divorce action from ever choosing to treat the income tax dependency exemption as a property issue rather than a child support issue." Id. at 646.
So it boils down to where the language is contained in your paperwork. If it is contained within the child support section, it is modifiable. Some reasons for modifying the exemption award would be a change of custody or parenting time - if the original parent awarded the exemption in the judgment no longer has custody, the parent who now has custody should be awarded the exemption.
If the language is contained within the property division section of the judgment, then it is treated as part of the property settlement, making it non-modifiable, absent an agreement between the parties to change it.
Wherever I place the exemption provision in the judgment, I specifically state that both parties understand that the provision is either modifiable or non-modifiable in the future, so that everyone is on the same page and doesn't gripe that they had no idea whether or not it could be changed. (To be honest, the griping will likely occur regardless).
Be sure to check out where your income tax dependency exemption is contained in your paperwork and if applicable, complete IRS Form 8332 as this can save you from a headache when it comes around to tax time each year. I think we all agree that tax season causes enough strife as is.
And by the way: Verdict wanted me to tell you that all birthday treats, bones and toys can be sent to my office in honor of her big day.
The author is an associate attorney at the Law Office of Robert Matyjaszek, PLLC, Jackson, Michigan. Her blog site is: http://legalbling.blogspot.com. She can be reached at (517) 787-0351 or by emailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com
Published: Mon, Mar 18, 2013
headlines Jackson County
headlines National
- Judge accused in drive-by shootings has progressive brain disease, court filing says
- Despite lyrics mistake by AI, lawyer wasn’t ineffective for using tech in rapper’s case, federal judge says
- Former Littler lawyer drops California suit against firm, bringing end to departure dispute
- Last-minute election lawsuits may serve political goals, law prof says
- Criticizing plaintiff’s ‘chutzpah,’ federal judge holds lawyer jointly responsible for over $207K in legal fees
- Personal injury firm sues TD Bank after loss in fraud scheme