COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Evidence that corroborates a crime has no bearing on the sentence an offender should receive, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled Wednesday as it tossed out part of an Ohio sex assault law.
The court’s 6-1 ruling, which addressed sex assaults on children under 13, also rejected corroborating evidence as a sentencing tool in plea deals where a jury did not consider the evidence.
Corroborating evidence is irrelevant to the purpose of sentencing, namely “protecting the public from future crime and punishing the offender,” Justice Judith Lanzinger wrote for the majority.
Lawmakers have “unconstitutionally created two different sanctions to be imposed on offenders who commit the same crime — differentiated only by the quantity of the evidence presented to prove guilt,” Lanzinger said.
Prosecutors argued unsuccessfully that lawmakers have wide discretion in defining crimes and fixing punishments.
The decision overturned a three-year prison sentence for gross sexual imposition handed down to a Franklin County man.
- Posted February 13, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Sentencing aspect tossed in sex assault law
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- More lawyers—and clients—want to learn about sustainable development practices
- Top artificial intelligence insurance tips for lawyers
- Lawyer charged with illegally transmitting Michigan data after 2020 election
- Viral video shows former Rikers Island inmate as she learns she passed bar exam on first try
- How Sullivan & Cromwell is scrutinizing potential new hires after campus protests
- No separate hearing required when police seize cars loaned to drivers accused of drug crimes, SCOTUS rules