HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A Pennsylvania appellate court has struck down a law designed to make it easier for organizations like the National Rifle Association to challenge local firearms ordinances in court.
Commonwealth Court ruled recently that the procedure lawmakers used to enact the law violated the state constitution.
Under the law, gun owners no longer had to show they were harmed by an ordinance to challenge it, and it let “membership organizations” like the NRA sue on behalf of any Pennsylvania member.
The provision was merged in last year’s legislative session with a bill whose intent was to establish criminal penalties for theft of secondary metals, such as wires or cables.
The judges say it violated constitutional requirements that bills can’t be altered to change their original purpose and must be confined to one subject.
- Posted June 29, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court rejects law that aided gun challenges
headlines Macomb
- Fall family fun
- MDHHS announces enhancements to improve substance use disorder treatment access
- Levin Center looks at congressional investigation of torture and mistreatment of war detainees
- State Unemployment Insurance Agency provides tips on how to stop criminals from stealing benefits
- Supreme Court leaves in place Alaska campaign disclosure rules voters approved in 2020
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition