The Michigan Supreme Court has issued an order seeking public comment on proposed amendments to court rules that would codify existing statutory and caselaw requirements related to the issue of “Ability to Pay.” The amendments would require a court to make a finding about whether a defendant is able to comply with an order to pay without “manifest hardship,” would incorporate specific criteria to be considered by the court in making that finding, and would explicitly allow courts to impose alternative payment options. The suggested amendments were proposed by the Michigan State Planning Body for the Delivery of Legal Services to the Poor.
Bearden v Georgia, 461 US 660 (1983), established that incarcerating an individual for failure to pay without first determining whether the individual has the ability to pay fines, fees, and costs is a violation of the person’s constitutional rights. More recently, in response to Michigan judges asking for guidance on how and when to determine ability to pay, the State Court Administrative Office established an Ability to Pay workgroup made up of circuit and district judges, court administrators, indigent defense experts, and other stakeholders, which discussed ways to help courts address this issue.
The Ability to Pay workgroup report was published and distributed to courts and other interested parties early this year. The document included extensive resources for courts, including:
• Ability to Pay Checklists
• Statutory Requirements
• Court Rule Requirements
• Case Law Summary
• Ability to Pay Language
• Payment Plan Calculators
• Federal Poverty Guidelines Charts
• Means Test
• Payment Alternatives
• Incentives/Waivers
• Model Debt Inactivation Policy
The proposed amendments would supplement these other tools provided in the Ability to Pay workgroup report. Comments from the public on the proposed court rule amendments will help the Court decide whether the proposed changes should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected.
To comment, write to: ADMcomment@courts.mi.gov; or write to: Office of Administrative Counsel, PO Box 30052, Lansing, 48909. The deadline is March 1, 2016.
- Posted December 31, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Ability to Pay' amendments to court rules published for public comment
headlines Washtenaw County
- Cooley Law School professors part of Accesslex Institute’s initiative to prepare for Nextgen bar exam
- Entrepreneur looks to a career in transactional law
- Wayne Law Professor Noah Hall co-authors a new book on water law policies
- International Court of Justice judge speaks on importance of international law
- Retirement event for Judge Timothy Connors is set for Dec. 30
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition