WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will consider the rights of businesses and landowners that the Army Corps of Engineers has determined are subject to the federal Clean Water Act.
The justices recently said they will hear an appeal from a Minnesota company that says it has no effective means to challenge the Corps’ decision that a peat bog is off limits for mining because it contains protected wetlands.
Hawkes Company, Inc. says it can’t contest the government’s determination without applying for a permit that costs more than $270,000 and takes years to process.
A federal appeals court sided with the company, saying it could file a legal challenge.
The Obama administration had urged the high court to take up the case, saying it affects thousands of similar decisions annually and could bog the government down in piecemeal litigation.
In 2012, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that property owners had a right to prompt judicial review when facing an Environmental Protection Agency order halting construction in an area the agency had designated protected wetlands.
- Posted January 05, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
High court to consider Army Corps decision on protected wetlands
headlines Macomb
- Fall family fun
- MDHHS announces enhancements to improve substance use disorder treatment access
- Levin Center looks at congressional investigation of torture and mistreatment of war detainees
- State Unemployment Insurance Agency provides tips on how to stop criminals from stealing benefits
- Supreme Court leaves in place Alaska campaign disclosure rules voters approved in 2020
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition