The biggest battleground over the initiative is likely to be over whether it hinders free speech. Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 ruling in Citizens United opened the door to a flood of dark money, a debate has raged throughout the country not only whether government should require the sources of dark money to be disclosed, but how far government can go to force that disclosure.
Elections attorney Kory Langhofer, a critic of the Open and Honest Disclosure initiative, said the initiative will have a chilling effect on First Amendment free speech rights, which he argued could lead it to be found unconstitutional.
The initiative requires independent expenditure groups that spend money to influence candidate campaigns to disclosure the original source – as well as any intermediaries who passed the money along to its destination – of any contribution of more than $10,000. Failure to do so within 24 hours of an expenditure would subject the group to a fine of up to three times the amount of the violation.
Langhofer said Chief Justice John Roberts made clear in Citizens United that any restrictions that make people pause before exercising their free speech rights could be constitutionally problematic.
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available