We have a new law that takes effect on June 27, 2016.
It amends EPIC to enable a person (decedant) to declare a funeral representative who would have the right and power to make decisions about funeral arrangements and the handling, disposition or disinterment of the decedant’s body after death.
Briefly, the act would amend the Estates and Protected Individuals Code to do the following:
• Revise the order of priority for the individuals who have the right and power to make decisions about funeral arrangements and the disposition of a decedent's body, and include a designated funeral representative among those individuals.
• Authorize an adult of sound mind to designate another adult of sound mind as a funeral representative, granting that person the right and power to make decisions about funeral arrangements and the disposition of the declarant's body.
• Include a funeral representative in the definition of "fiduciary", thus specifying that a funeral representative has a duty to fulfill after the declarant's death.
• Allow a declarant to designate a successor funeral representative in the event the first person named did not accept, was incapacitated, resigned, or was removed.
• Specify individuals who could not serve as a funeral representative for a declarant, including people associated with a funeral establishment, cemetery, or crematory who would provide services for the declarant.
• Specify circumstances under which a funeral representative designation would be revoked, including the representative's resignation, failure to locate the funeral representative after reasonable efforts, or the funeral representative's refusal to exercise their rights or powers under the bill or failure to act within 48 hours after receiving notice of the decedent's death.
• Specify that a divorce or annulment of a marriage would revoke a nomination of a divorced individual's former spouse or a relative of the former spouse to serve as a funeral representative for the decedent.
• Specify that a divorce or annulment would bar the former spouse from exercising a power to make decisions about funeral arrangements and the handling, disposition, and disinterment of the decedent's body or cremated remains.
• Specify that the felonious and intentional killing or the conviction for the abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a decedent would revoke a nomination of the killer or House Fiscal
Agency Page 1 of 3 felon to serve as a funeral representative for the decedent and would bar that person from exercising a power to make decisions about funeral
arrangements and the handling, disposition, and disinterment of the decedent's body or cremated remains.
• Revise provisions for petitioning the court when there is a disagreement as to who has the right and power to make decisions about funeral arrangements and the disposition of a decedent's body.
• Repeal Section 3208 of EPIC which provides that in the case of a disagreement or if no one can be located, certain individuals could petition the court to determine who has the authority to exercise the rights and powers over a decedent's body and funeral arrangements.
———————————
Alan F. Polack specializes in elder and probate law and practices out of Shelby Township. He is a former president of the Macomb County Probate Bar Association.
- Posted April 05, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ELDER LAW ALERT: Public Act 57 of 2016
headlines Macomb
- Fall family fun
- MDHHS announces enhancements to improve substance use disorder treatment access
- Levin Center looks at congressional investigation of torture and mistreatment of war detainees
- State Unemployment Insurance Agency provides tips on how to stop criminals from stealing benefits
- Supreme Court leaves in place Alaska campaign disclosure rules voters approved in 2020
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition