MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The state Supreme Court has deadlocked on whether the Legislature properly banned a legal theory that allowed dozens of lead paint lawsuits to proceed.
Legislators in 2013 passed a law barring attorneys from using the risk contribution theory as a basis for pending lead paint poisoning lawsuits. The theory apportions liability based on a manufacturer’s market share, enabling lawsuits even if the plaintiffs aren’t sure which manufacturer’s paint poisoned them.
Attorneys in one pending case argued lawmakers couldn’t apply the prohibition retroactively.
One justice didn’t participate and the vote was 3-3. An appellate court that had been asked earlier to decide the case but refused now must take it up.
- Posted April 18, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lead paint case back to lower court
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- This Los Angeles lawyer found her calling as a death doula
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Artificial intelligence tools for brief writing and analysis are a small firm litigator’s new best friend
- Baker McKenzie partner drops suit seeking IRS documents on partnership scrutiny
- Family members sue networks after learning of loved ones’ deaths by seeing bodies on TV
- Ex-BigLaw attorney once ‘consumed with remorse’ over $10M client theft sentenced in new scheme