The American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility has issued Formal Opinion 476 that addresses confidentiality issues that arise when a lawyer moves to withdraw from a civil case because of a client’s failure to pay legal fees.
The opinion recommends a process for the lawyer and the trial judge when the lawyer seeks to withdraw from civil litigation because of fee issues and how much, if any, confidential client information the lawyer should disclose in filing a motion to withdraw. Since sticky situations can arise, “this requires cooperation between lawyers and judges.”
In a lawyer’s request to withdraw as counsel in a civil proceeding based on a client’s failure to pay, at least two ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct come into play. A lawyer has a duty of confidentiality under Rule 1.6. That rule must be reconciled with the court’s need for sufficient information upon which to rule on motions made consistent with Rule 1.16, which deals with declining or terminating representation.
Under the guidance in Formal Opinion 476, a lawyer who has a good faith basis for withdrawal under subsections of Rule 1.16 should first submit a motion providing no confidential client information apart from a reference to “professional considerations” or the like.
“Upon being informed by the court that further information is necessary, respond, when practicable, by seeking to persuade the court to rule on the motion without requiring the disclosure of confidential client information, asserting all non-frivolous claims of confidentiality and privilege,” Formal Opinion 476 said in its guidance to attorneys.
If that approach fails, the opinion suggests that the lawyer “submit only such information as is reasonably necessary to satisfy the needs of the court and preferably by whatever restricted means of submission, such as in camera review under seal, or such other procedures designated to minimize disclosure as the court determines is appropriate.”
Formal Opinion 476 is available on the ABA Center for Professional Responsibility website.
- Posted December 26, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
ABA issues guidance for nonpayment issues
headlines Jackson County
headlines National
- Lucy Lang, NY inspector general, has always wanted rules evenly applied
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2024 Year in Review: Integrated legal AI and more effective case management
- How to ensure your legal team is well-prepared for the shifting privacy landscape
- Judge denies bid by former Duane Morris partner to stop his wife’s funeral
- Attorney discipline records short of disbarment would be expunged after 8 years under state bar plan