EAST GRAND RAPIDS (AP) — The Michigan Court of Appeals has affirmed the drunken-driving conviction of a man who was stopped near Grand Rapids solely because one taillight was weaker than the other.
The case against Trevor Vanderhart was a misdemeanor, but it has gone through three courts so far. The appeals court decision last week produced 18 pages of analysis by three judges.
A police officer in East Grand Rapids said he stopped Vanderhart in 2014, based on a weak taillight. Tests revealed a blood-alcohol level above the legal limit.
Vanderhart argued the evidence should be thrown out because a dim taillight is not a reason to stop a car. But appeals Judge Brock Swartzle says the light created a dangerous condition that was enough to justify the stop under state law.
- Posted April 17, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Appeals court: Weak taillight is enough to stop drunken driver
headlines Macomb
- All hands on deck for mock trial
- Man arraigned on charges including aggravated child sexually abusive activity
- Nessel urges residents to report threats, suspicious activity following Temple Israel attack
- Woman sentenced after pleading no contest to charge related to death of woman on I-696
- American Bar Association announces 2026 women lawyers of achievement
headlines National
- Did They Know the Score? Amid March Madness, questions remain about college athletes indicted in fixing scheme
- Google’s AI platform incited man’s death by suicide and ‘mass casualty’ attempt, suit alleges
- Goldman Sachs’ top lawyer, who has been linked to Epstein, exits with $25M pay package
- 2 lawyers convicted in staged truck accidents scheme
- Elon Musk defrauded Twitter investors in $44B buyout, jury finds
- Federal judges speak out about threats becoming ‘ordinary’
