The Michigan Civil Rights Commission voted recently to submit an amicus brief in a case before the U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that the application of Michigan’s Emergency Manager Law should be subject to judicial review under the federal Voting Rights Act.
In the brief, the commission will argue that when a political change has the effect of disparately lessening the voting rights of a protected class, voters are entitled to judicial review to determine whether there is adequate legal justification for doing so.
“From our investigation into the Flint water crisis, we believe the lack of accountability from the Emergency Manager to the people and elected representatives of City of Flint is a shortcoming of the Emergency Manager law found in P.A. 436,” said commission co-chair Laura Reyes Kopack.
Flint residents “are entitled to judicial review of whether the appointment of an EM violated their rights under the Voting Rights Act,” she said.
The commission’s final report on its investigation into the Flint water crisis included recommendations for action in the aftermath of the crisis, including one that the state replace or restructure Michigan’s emergency manager law.
The case is Bellant v. Snyder.
- Posted May 01, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Panel votes to file brief in case challenging state's EM law
headlines Macomb
- Nonprofit gets a boost
- Nessel joins multistate coalition to defend U.S. EPA’s greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles
- Michigan 529 Awareness Day calls on families to save with MET and MESP for children’s educational future
- Department highlights importance of 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline during Mental Health Month
- No charges for officer in death of Michigan teen struck by police car during chase
headlines National
- This Los Angeles lawyer found her calling as a death doula
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Artificial intelligence tools for brief writing and analysis are a small firm litigator’s new best friend
- Baker McKenzie partner drops suit seeking IRS documents on partnership scrutiny
- Family members sue networks after learning of loved ones’ deaths by seeing bodies on TV
- Ex-BigLaw attorney once ‘consumed with remorse’ over $10M client theft sentenced in new scheme