Michigan State University College of Law Professor Anne Lawton recently concluded work on the first comprehensive empirical study of individuals in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.
Individuals account for more than a third of chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, and this share has grown over time. But little is known about these individuals, why they opt for chapter 11 (rather than the more structured chapter 13), and their success at confirming and performing their chapter 11 repayment plans.
With funding from the Anthony H.N. Schnelling Endowment Fund of the American Bankruptcy Institute, Professors Lawton, Richard Hynes of the University of Virginia School of Law, and Margaret Howard of Washington & Lee School of Law sought to answer these questions.
They found that individuals who use chapter 11 tend to have greater assets, debts, income and expenses than individuals in chapter 13, and that the overwhelming majority are operating some type of business or own significant real estate.
Among other things, the study found that individuals represented by experienced attorneys are much more likely to succeed in obtaining confirmation of their chapter 11 plans than debtors who represent themselves. These and other findings have significant implications for Congress and policymakers evaluating the effectiveness and fairness of our bankruptcy laws.
The Study was published in volume 25 of the American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review.
- Posted May 22, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
MSU Law professor finishes work on national study of individual Chapter 11 bankruptcies

headlines Ingham County
- 55th District Court celebrates 64th Sobriety Court graduation
- Executive orders and the assault on DEI in the workplace
- MSU Law student among MALDEF scholarship recipients
- International Bar Association (IBA) launches podcast series ‘Inspirational Legal Women’
- Law student is a paralegal with the Air National Guard
headlines National
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Judge accused of using ‘game or jail’ tactic, asserting abuse victims get ‘Super Bowl’ neurochemicals
- Prosecutor gets suspension for invading jury’s ‘inner sanctum’
- Lateral hiring bounced back in 2024, especially for associates in BigLaw, new NALP report says
- Refugee ban can’t be enforced against those who received conditional approval, 9th Circuit says
- ABA, more than 50 bar associations condemn ‘government actions that seek to twist the scales of justice’