WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case about billions of dollars awarded by a court to victims of the 1998 bombing of the U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
More than 200 people died in the attacks and more than 1,000 were injured.
The justices have begun their summer break, but said they would hear the case after they resume hearing arguments in the fall.
The case the justices agreed to hear involves a group of individuals who were victims of the attacks and their family members.
They sued Sudan, arguing that it caused the bombings by providing material support to al Qaeda.
A trial court awarded approximately $10.2 billion in damages including approximately $4.3 billion in punitive damages.
But an appeals court overturned the punitive damages award. The Supreme Court will determine if that decision was correct.
A law called the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act generally says that foreign countries are immune from civil lawsuits in federal and state courts in the United States.
But there’s an exception when a country is designated a “state sponsor of terrorism” as Sudan was.
The Supreme Court is being asked to decide whether the law allows punitive damages for events that happened before the most recent revision to the act in 2008.
- Posted July 08, 2019
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Supreme Court agrees to hear 1998 embassy bombings case
headlines Macomb
- Fall family fun
- MDHHS announces enhancements to improve substance use disorder treatment access
- Levin Center looks at congressional investigation of torture and mistreatment of war detainees
- State Unemployment Insurance Agency provides tips on how to stop criminals from stealing benefits
- Supreme Court leaves in place Alaska campaign disclosure rules voters approved in 2020
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition