U-M Law
In just her second year of teaching at the University of Michigan Law School, Professor Leah Litman has been chosen by students to receive the L. Hart Wright Award for Excellence in Teaching. The general sentiment of the many students who nominated her is that she is "awesome," "brilliant," and "goes above and beyond to support students in the classroom and outside of it."
"I'm honored, touched, and humbled to be recognized by the students in this way," said Litman, a 2010 graduate of the Law School. "I know this past year has been a difficult one, as we've shifted to new and different forms of instruction and as everyone has been under additional pressure and stress. It means a lot to hear that the students have enjoyed some of what I've been trying to do in that new and different setting. I found law school, and my time at Michigan, to be so eye opening and intellectually challenging and rewarding. Being able to pay it forward and give that gift back to other Michigan students is incredible."
Litman teaches and writes on constitutional law, federal courts, and federal sentencing. Her current research focuses on systemic challenges in federal habeas review. She entered academia in 2014 following private practice and clerkships with The Honorable Jeffrey S. Sutton of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the Supreme Court of the United States. Litman returned to Michigan Law as a faculty member in 2019 hoping to study the purpose of legal processes and the role of the legal profession, and to encourage law students to think about those issues as they are entering the profession. Professor Litman previously was a Climenko Fellow and Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, where she received one of its inaugural Student Government Teaching and Advising Awards, and an assistant professor at the University of California, Irvine, School of Law, where she received the Professor of the Year Award in 2019.
Litman says her overall approach to teaching is to encourage students to think critically about everything they encounter. "It's important to me that students learn the kinds of questions they should be asking themselves when they are reading an opinion, constructing an argument, or responding to an argument," she said. "It's equally important that students understand the context and the consequences of the legal issues that we cover in the course. Part of understanding where we are now is knowing how we got here. And I want students to see how law and legal arguments can serve many different purposes. By the end of the class, my goal is for the students to feel empowered and to feel comfortable challenging what they read and what they are told. I don't want them to just accept what they are told or what they read about the law. I want them to be able to talk about difficult issues and come to their own assessment about what the law is and what it should be used for."
The L. Hart Wright Award is named after the beloved Michigan Law professor who was renowned in the field of tax law. The student-nominated award is presented annually to a faculty member by the Law School Student Senate (LSSS).
- Posted May 06, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Professor Leah Litman is winner of L. Hart Wright Teaching Award
headlines Washtenaw County
- Cooley Law School professors part of Accesslex Institute’s initiative to prepare for Nextgen bar exam
- Entrepreneur looks to a career in transactional law
- Wayne Law Professor Noah Hall co-authors a new book on water law policies
- International Court of Justice judge speaks on importance of international law
- Retirement event for Judge Timothy Connors is set for Dec. 30
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition