Jarrett Skorup, Mackinac Center for Public Policy
A recent report notes that Michigan is 40th out of the 50 states when it comes to taxpayer support for universities. This has been used to support the idea that the state should give more money to its 15 public universities. But a closer look at the study suggests the opposite.
The State Higher Education Finance report is put together annually by the State Higher Education Executive Officers Association. The latest edition says that in total, Michigan spends just under $5,000 per full-time equivalent student, or FTE, compared to the national average of $8,392 per FTE.
A widely held assumption is that more spending on universities will lower tuition, generate more graduates and improve the economy. The evidence shows it doesn’t work that way.
More money does not mean lower tuition. Or at least not much lower. The report shows that for decades, almost regardless of how much lawmakers have given universities in appropriations, tuition has steadily increased. The overall costs of Michigan’s 15 public universities have skyrocketed. If lawmakers wanted to make a deal with universities to return tuition to what it was a decade ago, doing so would require state support to go up by nearly $3 billion – tripling what the state is spending today.
More money does not mean more graduates. The report does calculations for all 50 states. The five states with the most public spending per student are New Mexico, Wyoming, Alaska, Illinois and Hawaii. They are ranked 39, 22, 17, 16 and 15 for educational attainment. The states with the least amount of public spending per student are Arizona, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Vermont and Colorado. They are ranked 33, 28, 6, 5 and 2 for college graduates. There’s no correlation in spending more money on universities and getting more college graduates.
Having more college graduates in a state does not mean a better economy. The simplest way to measure this is by looking at income growth across states and comparing that to the percentage of college graduates in each state. Doing that reveals no correlation between the two.
Michigan gives money to its 15 public universities based on politics rather than performance. Spending even more money is unlikely to be worthwhile, and residents cannot expect either more graduates or improved growth from it.
—————
Jarrett Skorup is the director of marketing and communications at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
- Posted June 11, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Giving Michigan universities more money is not a good return on investment
headlines Detroit
- Cooley Law School Innocence Project secures release of man wrongly convicted of murder
- Internationally renowned animal law professor David Favre retires from MSU
- Don’t confuse AI search with legal advice
- Daily Briefs
- If using ChatGPT is cheating, what about ghostwriting? The old debate behind a new panic
headlines National
- AI-powered bill collector program takes top spot at ABA Techshow’s Startup Alley
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Where can 1Ls get five-figure signing bonuses?
- Law firms see more cyberattacks, ransomware threats, new report says
- BigLaw’s share of litigation funding dropped in 2025
- Woman faces murder charge after allegedly taking abortion medication




