GREENLEAF TOWNSHIP (AP) — A tiny community in Michigan's Thumb region has a large legal bill.
Greenleaf Township, population 740, must pay roughly $140,000 in legal fees to a resident who won a $500 verdict in a dispute over Michigan's open meetings law, an appeals court said.
The amount is greater than the township's annual budget, Greenleaf Clerk Judy Keller said.
The township argued that the fees were excessive when compared to the small amount awarded to Christina Gibbard. But the court noted that state law grants “actual” legal fees to the winning side in an open meetings claim, not “reasonable.”
“We thus must affirm the award,” the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Tuesday, describing it as “gargantuan.”
Gibbard and Shelly Cook, watchdogs in the Sanilac County township, sued Greenleaf officials over open meetings violations as well as First Amendment retaliation and other allegations. A jury in 2018 awarded $500 to Gibbard on the open meetings claim.
U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith said time spent on the case by Gibbard's attorneys was rooted in the open meetings dispute, even if some was technically related to non-meeting claims.
- Posted June 23, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Township must pay $140K in legal fees on $500 verdict
headlines Macomb
- Fall family fun
- MDHHS announces enhancements to improve substance use disorder treatment access
- Levin Center looks at congressional investigation of torture and mistreatment of war detainees
- State Unemployment Insurance Agency provides tips on how to stop criminals from stealing benefits
- Supreme Court leaves in place Alaska campaign disclosure rules voters approved in 2020
headlines National
- Professional success is not achieved through participation trophies
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- ‘Jailbreak: Love on the Run’ misses chance to examine staff sexual misconduct at detention centers
- Utah considers allowing law grads to choose apprenticeship rather than bar exam
- Can lawyers hold doctors accountable for wasting our time?
- Lawyer suspended after arguing cocaine enhanced his cognition