Local Voice: Parenting time factors, Part Dos

Marie E. Matyjaszek
Law Office of Robert Matyjaszek

Note: This is the second part of a two part series. Part Uno ran the April 9, 2013, edition of DLN.

Last month we examined the first five factors for parenting time that the courts should consider, as outlined in Michigan statute MCL 722.27a(6)(a-i).

Now it’s time for the last four. But before I start, I want to make a quick comment on the fourth factor based on my remarks last time regarding abuse.

I should have mentioned that at times, a child can be abusive to his or her parent. And while I’ve thankfully only seen this in a limited number of cases, it does happen. This factor can relate to the abuse of a parent at the hands of a child or the other party, and both possible scenarios should be taken into consideration by the court.

Now, moving on to factor six, and whether a parent can reasonably be expected to exercise parenting time in accordance with the court order.

Is the schedule proposed or ordered something that mom or dad can actually exercise? Work shifts, where one lives, the distance necessary to travel, and other considerations are all things that can impact the reality of whether or not the parenting time schedule will actually function properly and allow the parent to see the child on those designated days and times.

The next factor is whether a parent has frequently failed to exercise reasonable parenting time.

This is why I harp on my clients to make sure they utilize the parenting time schedule they presently have to the fullest, because it can come back to bite you if you don’t.

Obviously if you’re not using all the time you have now, what are the chances that a judge will increase your time in the future?  Not likely.  And if the motion is to reduce a parent’s time with his or her child, there’s a greater chance it will be granted if the parent isn’t complying with the current order.

So please, dear parents, use your parenting time!

Have you ever thought that your ex will use parenting time to hide or keep the child from you? That’s the subject of the next factor, “The threatened or actual detention of the child with the intent to retain or conceal the child from the other parent or from a third person who has legal custody. A custodial parent’s temporary residence with the child in a domestic violence shelter shall not be construed as evidence of the custodial parent’s intent to retain or conceal the child from the other parent.”

If your ex has ever used parenting time as a way to prevent you from having your child during your rightful time, has ever refused to give him or her back on time, or threatens any of this, it needs to be taken into consideration when modifying or establishing any parenting time schedule.

A lot of clients are fearful of this happening, and the person threatening this behavior will often stop after a stern talk from his or her attorney that this is not a good idea under any circumstance. However, in a domestic violence situation, this is much more of a reality and all such comments and behavior need to be documented and reported quickly.

 The final factor is what we call a “catch all,” in that you can include whatever else you think is relevant, as the statute literally states  “any other relevant factors.” 

The court will look at the Best Interest of the Child Factors, MCL 722.23 for parenting time also. But it is imperative to go through the various statutory parenting time factors when pleading your case to ensure that you have everything covered.

In doing so, you’re giving yourself the best possible chance for success.


Marie E. Matyjaszek is an associate attorney at the Law Office of Robert Matyjaszek, PLLC. Her blog site is http://legalbling.blogspot.com.


  1. No comments
Sign in to post a comment »