- Posted March 08, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Family joyriding' at issue in insurance case before Michigan Supreme Court
Does a "family joyriding" doctrine require auto insurers to pay medical expenses for two drivers who drove family members' cars - despite knowing that the owners had forbidden them to do so?
That is a question the Michigan Supreme Court is considering when hearing oral arguments this week.
In Spectrum Health Hospitals v Farm Bureau, a car owner allowed his son's girlfriend to use his car, but had forbidden his son to drive the car and had also warned the girlfriend not to let the son drive it. But the son, who lacked a valid driver's license, borrowed the car with his girlfriend's permission and got into an accident while legally drunk.
In Progressive Marathon Insurance v DeYoung, a man with four drunk driving convictions was specifically excluded from his wife's auto insurance policy, and she had also forbidden him to drive her car. Despite knowing this, the man took his wife's car without permission and crashed it while driving drunk.
The insurance companies in both cases argued that the injured drivers had "taken unlawfully" in violation of Michigan's No-Fault Act, MCL 500.3113(a), which provides that "A person is not entitled to be paid personal protection insurance benefits for accidental bodily injury if at the time of the accident ... the person was using a motor vehicle or motorcycle which he or she had taken unlawfully ...."
But in both cases, the Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that the "taken unlawfully" provision does not apply to "family joyriding," where a family member borrows a car without permission but without meaning to steal it.
The Court of Appeals judges in Progressive Marathon said they were "acutely aware" that the no-fault act does not provide a family joyriding exception, but said they were constrained by prior appellate decisions that recognized the doctrine.
Published: Thu, Mar 8, 2012
headlines Washtenaw County
- National Center for State Courts supports new legislation to protect state court judges from escalating threats
- ABA Commission on Women in the Profession announces five recipients of the 2024 Margaret Brent award
- CDAM Honors
- ACLU launches interactive map that tracks book bans and other forms of censorship in Michigan
- Bodman attorney enjoys ‘code driven’ tax law
headlines National
- New Legalese: You may have heard a deepfake, but what about ‘Twiqbal’?
- From Intake to Outcome: An in-house lawyer’s guide to matter management solutions
- 2 BigLaw firms in merger talks that could produce 1,600-lawyer firm with top 50 revenue
- Send in the paralegals
- Lawyer reprimanded after mistakenly emailing opposing counsel with plan to avoid judge’s call
- ‘I don’t play well’ judge who threatened to track down, jail misbehaving litigant gets tossed from case