––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted November 06, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Complex litigation focus of FBA doubleheader
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be045/be045edf32cf0099830e0b409941fe95374cb203" alt=""
The Federal Bar Association (FBA), Eastern District of Michigan Chapter, will present its "Complex Litigation Seminar Doubleheader 2012" on Wednesday, Nov. 14, from 2 to 5 p.m. in Room 115 of the Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse in Detroit.
The program will begin with "Creating an Efficient Presentation at Trial in Complex Litigation" featuring a panel with U.S. District Judges David M. Lawson, Victoria A. Roberts, and Mark A. Goldsmith.
The next half of the program will look at "Best Practices for Pretrial Proceedings in a Complex Case" featuring a panel with U.S. Magistrate Judges R. Steven Whalen, Laurie J. Michelson, and David R. Grand.
A reception with panelists immediately follows. Conference co-chairs and moderators are Jeffrey A. Sadowski of Howard & Howard, A. Michael Palizzi of Miller Canfield, and Mark Aiello of Foley & Lardner.
Cost is $20 for FBA members and $25 for non-members. Scholarships available to law students and others in special circumstances.
Register for the program online at www.fbamich.org/Events/Event4.aspx. For additional information, contact FBA Executive Director Brian Figot at fbamich@fbamich.org.
Published: Tue, Nov 6, 2012
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- March 1, 1828: Sojourner Truth goes to court
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- DOJ nominees hedge on whether court orders must always be followed
- DNA evidence in open cases explored in ABC reality series
- Which law-related films have won Oscars? You may be surprised (photo gallery)
- ‘Radical agreement’ could lead to Supreme Court victory for reverse-discrimination plaintiff