––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted February 28, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lecture to focus on cases involving sexual assault and juvenile life sentences
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be045/be045edf32cf0099830e0b409941fe95374cb203" alt=""
Cooley Law School's Center for Ethics, Service and Professionalism will host a discussion on sexual assault and the class-action lawsuit, Neal v. Michigan Department of Corrections, at its Wednesday, March 6, "Integrity in Our Communities" event.
Attorney Cary McGehee, a trial lawyer for the suit, will speak about her work on behalf of the 500 female prisoners who were sexually assaulted by male prison guards and who filed the suit against the Michigan Department of Corrections. McGehee, a founding partner of Pitt, McGehee, Palmer, Rivers, & Golden PC, will also discuss her current justice initiative of acquiring mitigation hearings for juveniles previously sentenced to mandatory life in prison without parole.
Cooley's Integrity in our Communities speaker series offers students, staff, faculty and guests the opportunity to hear attorneys, judges, and dedicated professionals speak about ethics, service, and professionalism.
The lecture will start at noon in Room 145 of Cooley's Auburn Hills campus, 2630 Featherstone Road. Lunch will be provided for those who attend the March 6 event.
Published: Thu, Feb 28, 2013
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- March 1, 1828: Sojourner Truth goes to court
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- DOJ nominees hedge on whether court orders must always be followed
- DNA evidence in open cases explored in ABC reality series
- Which law-related films have won Oscars? You may be surprised (photo gallery)
- ‘Radical agreement’ could lead to Supreme Court victory for reverse-discrimination plaintiff