––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 05, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Drug company to pay county for bloated prices
Oakland County Executive L. Brooks Patterson announced that the county has recovered $362,018.02 on behalf of taxpayers from a large drug wholesaler that conspired to inflate the price of prescription drugs.
A class-action lawsuit brought against McKesson, the drug wholesaler, and First Data Bank, a publisher of drug data, said they wrongfully inflated the mark-up factor that determines the average wholesale price of prescription drugs. Their actions resulted in many municipal governments, including Oakland County, to overpay on more than 400 brand name prescription drugs between 2001 and 2006.
Patterson said the county's Corporation Counsel, Human Resources Department, and outside counsel, Sommers Schwartz, worked together to determine the damages against the county and recover the money.
"Our Corporation Counsel, Human Resources Department and outside counsel did an outstanding job," Patterson said. "Oakland County has a reputation for fiscal excellence because we always fight for the best interest of our taxpayers."
Oakland County was one of 1,128 valid claimants against McKesson and First Data Bank. They paid $82 million into a fund for distribution to claimants as part of the class-action settlement. The average payment was $55,746.90. For more information about the lawsuit, go to www.McKessonGovernmentAWPClassActionLawsuit.com.
The name of the class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Massachusetts is In Re McKesson Governmental Entities Average Wholesale Price Litigation, case no. 1:08 CV 10843 USDC. U.S. District Court Chief Judge Patti B. Saris, District of Massachusetts, presided.
Published: Mon, Aug 5, 2013
headlines Oakland County
- District court discourse
- Law school hosts Moot Court Winter 2026 In-House Competition
- Man pleads no contest to false report or threat of terrorism, aggravated stalking and habitual offender fourth
- ABA Formal Opinion 522 provides guidance on a lawyer’s duty to disclose grounds for judicial disqualification
- Webinar looks into ‘Building Stronger Traffic Data’
headlines National
- Judge grants stay in February 2025 California bar examinees’ case against ProctorU
- Blake Lively’s sexual harassment claims against Justin Baldoni face legal setback
- TikTok creator sued by immigration firm, accused of making defamatory comments online
- 15 attorney killings remain unsolved, Baja California Bar Association says
- ABA amicus brief supports law firms targeted by executive orders
- Legal services provider 8am and NFL’s Tampa Bay Buccaneers announce partnership




