––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted December 23, 2013
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Courts closed

The Oakland County Circuit and Probate Courts will be closed on Tuesday and Wednesday, Dec. 24-25, for the Christmas holiday and on Tuesday and Wednesday, Dec. 31-Jan.1, for the New Year’s holiday.
• • •
All offices of the United States District Court and the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Michigan will be CLOSED on Wednesday, Dec. 25, for the Christmas holiday and on Tuesday and Wednesday, Dec. 31-Jan.1, for the New Year’s holiday. In case of emergency, call 313-234-5656.
• • •
The Michigan Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, and the State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) will be closed on Tuesday and Wednesday, Dec. 24-25, for the Christmas holiday and on Tuesday and Wednesday, Dec. 31-Jan.1, for the New Year’s holiday.
The Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, and SCAO will be open on Thursday, Dec. 26; Friday, Dec. 27; and Monday, Dec. 30.
headlines Oakland County
- Fireside chat
- Four charged in connection to death of 5-year-old after hyperbaric chamber explosion at Oxford Center in Troy
- ABA council reiterates access to legal education standard is suspended
- Firm hosts March webinar on ‘Tariffs Uncovered: The Next Phase Managing the Impacts to Steel, Aluminum and Reciprocal Tariffs’
- Law school to host meet & greet information session for prospective students in Metro Detroit
headlines National
- March 1, 1828: Sojourner Truth goes to court
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- DOJ nominees hedge on whether court orders must always be followed
- DNA evidence in open cases explored in ABC reality series
- Which law-related films have won Oscars? You may be surprised (photo gallery)
- ‘Radical agreement’ could lead to Supreme Court victory for reverse-discrimination plaintiff