––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted February 12, 2014
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Michigan appeals court warns of scam emails
A scam e-mail that pretends to be from the Michigan Court of Appeals has been reported in Michigan.
In one reported version, the subject line states, "Your complaint received." The message reads in part, "Letter of acknowledgement. Hereby you are advised that we have received your complaint. Shortly after we receive your complaint confirmation we will initiate a trial." The recipient is then told to click on a hyperlink to "confirm your complaint."
Michigan Court of Appeals Chief Judge Williams B. Murphy said, "Please be warned: These e-mails are not from the Michigan Court of Appeals. This is a scam, possibly designed to load malware or spyware onto the victim's computer. Do not click on the link."
Similar scams have been reported in other states. Murphy said that those who receive the scam e-mails should report them to law enforcement and to abuse@michigan.gov.
Published: Wed, Feb 12, 2014
headlines Oakland County
- Graduation day
- Law school holds winter commencement
- Kenyan anti-FGM law punishes victims more often than perpetrators, new report finds
- New Environmental Justice Impact Grants support community improvement projects addressing environmental justice issues across Michigan
- Nessel warns consumers about holiday payment apps and scams
headlines National
- Class-action lawyer went from being 50 Cent’s roadie to taking on TikTok
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Poll: Which ABA Journal magazine cover from 2024 was your favorite?
- Check out our favorite 2024 photo galleries
- 5th Circuit judge’s remarks spur talk of Supreme Court audition
- Does judge’s reference to ‘little Chinese woman’ show bias? Appellate concurrence sees ‘pure stereotyping’