The Levin Center at Wayne State University Law School will present a virtual panel discussion on “Life after McGahn.” The webinar, co-hosted by the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), will take place Friday, October 8, from noon to 1:30 p.m. via Zoom.
In 2019, the House Judiciary Committee filed suit to enforce a subpoena compelling White House counsel Donald McGahn to testify. The Trump White House claimed absolute immunity on McGahn’s behalf.
After two years of intense litigation and multiple court decisions, in May 2021, the Committee and the Biden Administration agreed to dismiss the case and have McGahn testify in executive session with certain limitations.
The agreement left a number of critical issues undecided by the courts including the key issue in the McGahn case, whether certain senior presidential aides are absolutely immune to congressional subpoenas.
Various legislative proposals are now being considered to clarify to the courts Congress’ investigative authority and to expedite judicial decisions.
The virtual in-depth panel discussion will explore the reasons for and consequences of the McGahn settlement and the impact on separation of powers,
checks and balances, and congressional oversight.
To register for the event, visit https://law.wayne.edu/levin-center. Anyone with questions may email the Levin Center at Wayne Law at levincenter@wayne.edu.
- Posted September 14, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Life after McGahn' topic of webinar, October 8
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be045/be045edf32cf0099830e0b409941fe95374cb203" alt=""
headlines Oakland County
headlines National
- March 1, 1828: Sojourner Truth goes to court
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- DOJ nominees hedge on whether court orders must always be followed
- DNA evidence in open cases explored in ABC reality series
- Which law-related films have won Oscars? You may be surprised (photo gallery)
- ‘Radical agreement’ could lead to Supreme Court victory for reverse-discrimination plaintiff