- Posted December 21, 2021
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
COMMENTARY: Judge grants hippos their legal standing
By Marie E. Matyjaszek
With the holidays approaching, Christmas music is being played just about everywhere you go. Gayla Peevey sang "I want a Hippopotamus for Christmas" back in 1953, and may be happy to learn that the U.S. District Court in Cincinnat afforded drug lord Pablo Escobar's hippos the legal recognition as interested "persons."
The hippos were illegally imported by Escobar in the 1980s and lived on his ranch in Columbia with a host of other animals. When Escobar died a decade later, the four hippos were left on his property due to the difficulty in moving them. Facing no threats, they reproduced at an alarming rate and now number close to 100. They also apparently have no fear of people, and take frequent trips into town (presumably for shopping).
Because of their growth, the hippos pose a threat to the area's biodiversity, as well as to humans. The Columbian government began sterilizing some of the animals, and others are proponents of simply killing them. If you're wondering how the U.S. became involved in a Columbian lawsuit, the Animal Legal Defense Fund (ALDF) petitioned the U.S. District Court to award "interested persons" status to the hippos so that American experts could testify in the court case. A federal law allows "anyone who is an 'interested person' in a foreign lawsuit to ask a federal court to permit them to take depositions in the U.S. in support of their case."
Previous attempts to award animals personhood in the U.S. have been denied, but Judge Karen Litkovitz has changed that in granting the ALDF request. Many of the arguments in support of the recognition make sense animals already have various protections under the law and this allows for enforcement of these rights. In addition, businesses have standing in court and they are not biologically "people."
It's unclear what impact, if any, the U.S. ruling will have in a Columbian court. However, this case sets precedent for the future rights of other animals. In the past, similar cases for chimpanzees and elephants were denied. Maybe the judge has a soft spot for hippos like the song says, "only a hippopotamus will do."
--------
The author is an attorney referee at the Washtenaw County Friend of the Court; however, the views expressed in this column are her own. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Published: Tue, Dec 21, 2021
headlines Oakland County
- Youth Law Conference
- Oakland County Executive Coulter announces $3M pledge by Penske Family Foundation to Integrated Care Center
- Jury convicts Kalamazoo man in 2005 cold-case sexual assault
- Whitmer signs bills defending Michigan’s fair and free elections by protecting Michigan voters and supporting public safety
- Supreme Court doesn't seem convinced FDA was unfair in blocking flavored vapes as teen use increased
headlines National
- Lucy Lang, NY inspector general, has always wanted rules evenly applied
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2024 Year in Review: Integrated legal AI and more effective case management
- How to ensure your legal team is well-prepared for the shifting privacy landscape
- Judge denies bid by former Duane Morris partner to stop his wife’s funeral
- Attorney discipline records short of disbarment would be expunged after 8 years under state bar plan