The Fair Housing Center of Southeast and Mid-Michigan helped Lansing resident Daniel Black reach a settlement in an accessibility lawsuit filed against an apartment complex.
(Photo courtesy of FHC)
Daniel Black, a man with dwarfism, has settled his lawsuit after a five-year struggle against Capital Commons Apartments and First Housing Corporation in Lansing.
Black requested that his federally subsidized apartment be outfitted with a roll-in shower to accommodate his disability. He asked management at Capital Commons to replace the bathtub that was increasingly dangerous for him to use. He also requested that the building install an accessible electric entrance door so that he, other seniors, and people with disabilities could freely come and go without assistance from their accessible apartments.
With no progress on his request, Black contacted the Fair Housing Center of Southeast & Mid-Michigan (FHC). During the summer of 2022, FHC staff wrote letters, spoke with representatives, including their attorney, met with Capital Commons staff, and brought in the local housing inspector in an effort to resolve the complaint with Capital Commons and management company First Housing.
“Each time we made a request on behalf of Daniel Black, the landlord and corporate management had another reason for denying and delaying the accommodation,” said Niki Green, coordinator of Investigations and Legal Research for FHC.
According to Black, “I was tired of contorting myself to get over the side of the bathtub. It was dangerous, especially since I had already endured four back surgeries to relieve spinal pain. I have extensive metal hardware in my spine that severely limits my mobility. I wasn’t seeking anything unreasonable. I needed a reasonable modification to my ground floor accessible apartment. I wanted what everyone else had, access to their bathing and showering facilities.”
Under the Federal Fair Housing Act, it is unlawful to refuse to permit a reasonable modification of a dwelling occupied by a person with a disability if that modification “may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises. ...”
- Posted October 30, 2023
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Lansing man with disabilities settles accessibility lawsuit
headlines Oakland County
- Youth Law Conference
- Oakland County Executive Coulter announces $3M pledge by Penske Family Foundation to Integrated Care Center
- Jury convicts Kalamazoo man in 2005 cold-case sexual assault
- Whitmer signs bills defending Michigan’s fair and free elections by protecting Michigan voters and supporting public safety
- Supreme Court doesn't seem convinced FDA was unfair in blocking flavored vapes as teen use increased
headlines National
- Lucy Lang, NY inspector general, has always wanted rules evenly applied
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- 2024 Year in Review: Integrated legal AI and more effective case management
- How to ensure your legal team is well-prepared for the shifting privacy landscape
- Judge denies bid by former Duane Morris partner to stop his wife’s funeral
- Attorney discipline records short of disbarment would be expunged after 8 years under state bar plan