Cooley Law School Professor Mark Cooney recognizes honorees during Cooley Law Review’s 38th annual Distinguished Brief Award ceremony on May 30.
Attorney Nick Curcio (pictured) was honored for co-authoring a brief during Cooley Law Review’s 38th annual Distinguished Brief Award ceremony on May 30.
Former State of Michigan Solicitor General John Bursch speaks to attendees during Cooley Law Review’s 38th annual Distinguished Brief Award ceremony on May 30.
Cooley Law Review’s 38th annual Distinguished Brief Award ceremony on May 30 recognized the most scholarly briefs filed with the Michigan Supreme Court in 2023.
(Photos courtesy of Cooley Law)
The Cooley Law Review held its 38th annual Distinguished Brief Award ceremony on May 30, featuring guest speaker John Bursch, and honoring attorneys George Sinas, Lauren E. Kissel, Mark R. Granzotta, Nick Curcio, and Thomas R. Alward.
The ceremony recognized the most scholarly briefs filed with the Michigan Supreme Court in 2023. These briefs were evaluated by a panel of judges, using seven criteria: questions presented, point headings, statement of case, argument and analysis, style, mechanics, and best overall brief. The purpose of the award is to promote excellence in legal writing and to celebrate outstanding work by practicing lawyers. The winning briefs will be published in an upcoming edition of the Law Review.
Sinas, Kissel, and Granzotta were honored for their brief in Andary et al v. USSA Casualty Ins. Co. et al. That case concerned the medical-benefit reductions in the 2019 auto no-fault reform legislation. The question was whether those reductions could be applied retroactively to persons whose policies predated the new legislation and who were injured before its effective date.
Attorneys Curcio and Alward were honored for their brief in Schaaf v. Forbes. The question there was whether trustees appointed under the Michigan Trust Code can hold property, in their individual capacities, in a joint tenancy with other persons. The brief argued that such an arrangement was prohibited by common law.
During the event, Bursch, the former solicitor general for the State of Michigan, discussed collegiality among U.S. Supreme Court justices and advocates as a model for modern political discourse.
The ceremony recognized the most scholarly briefs filed with the Michigan Supreme Court in 2023. These briefs were evaluated by a panel of judges, using seven criteria: questions presented, point headings, statement of case, argument and analysis, style, mechanics, and best overall brief. The purpose of the award is to promote excellence in legal writing and to celebrate outstanding work by practicing lawyers. The winning briefs will be published in an upcoming edition of the Law Review.
Sinas, Kissel, and Granzotta were honored for their brief in Andary et al v. USSA Casualty Ins. Co. et al. That case concerned the medical-benefit reductions in the 2019 auto no-fault reform legislation. The question was whether those reductions could be applied retroactively to persons whose policies predated the new legislation and who were injured before its effective date.
Attorneys Curcio and Alward were honored for their brief in Schaaf v. Forbes. The question there was whether trustees appointed under the Michigan Trust Code can hold property, in their individual capacities, in a joint tenancy with other persons. The brief argued that such an arrangement was prohibited by common law.
During the event, Bursch, the former solicitor general for the State of Michigan, discussed collegiality among U.S. Supreme Court justices and advocates as a model for modern political discourse.
––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
http://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
