––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted August 18, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Court rescinds proposed legal solicitation amendment
By Roberta M. Gubbins
Legal News
The Michigan Supreme Court recently rescinded its order amending Rule 7.3 of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct to add a 30-day prohibition on targeted written solicitations following an injury, death, or accident that may give rise to a claim and require the labeling of letters and circulars, whether targeted or non-targeted, as advertising material.
That order, adopted 4-3, was to have taken effect September 1.
The proposed amendments to Rule 7.3, Direct Contact with Prospective Clients, defines, under the section "prohibited methods of communication," solicit as including contact that is directed to a specific person in person or by telephone or telegraph or by letter or other writing or by other communication.
A lawyer is absolutely prohibited from soliciting work by "written or recorded communication or by in-person or telephone contact if the prospective client" has indicated to the lawyer a desire not to be solicited or the solicitation involves coercion, duress or harassment.
The rule goes on to define what is not solicitation and is thus allowable. Included is a reference to Shapero v Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 486 US 466 (1988) and states that a solicitation sent to a person who may have a potential claim can only be sent 30 days after the injury, death or accident that gave rise to the claim and must contain the words "Advertising Material" on the envelope and at the beginning and ending of the any written communication.
Those words must appear whether the written communication is sent by regular mail, private carrier, electronically or in any other manner.
Comments on the proposed order may be sent to the Supreme Court in writing or electronically by November 1, 2011 at P.O. Box 30052, Lansing, MI 48909 or MSC_clerk @courts.mi.gov.
The Court welcomes the views of all. This matter also will be considered at a public hearing.
A copy of the proposed order is available at the Michigan Supreme Court website.
Published: Thu, Aug 18, 2011
headlines Jackson County
- Michigan Law’s Child Welfare Appellate Clinic marks a significant win on housing at State Court of Appeals
- U-M engineering grad eyes a career in patent law
- ABA: Lawyer’s duties should not mislead when acting as a third-party mediator
- New State Bar ethics opinion offers stipulations for judicial officers
- ‘JAEPC Meeting’
headlines National
- Nikole Nelson champions a national model to bring legal services to those without access
- Social media and your legal career
- OJ Simpson estate accepts $58M claim by father of Ron Goldman, killed along with Nicole Brown Simpson
- Law prof who called for military action and end to Israel sues over teaching suspension
- The advantages of using an AI agent in contract review
- Courthouse rock, political talk lead to potential suspension for Elvis-loving judge




