- Posted September 26, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Senate budget plan would cut legal aid funding by millions if approved
![](/Content/LegalNews/images/article_db_image1.jpg)
The Daily Record Newswire
Funding for the Legal Services Corporation, the nonprofit provider of civil legal aid for low-income Americans, would be reduced by $8 million in a plan approved by a Senate committee.
The $396 million proposed Senate budget for fiscal 2012 would represent a 2 percent cut to the organization, which also received funding from private sources. Under a House plan, funding to the organization would be cut by 26 percent to $300 million.
LSC officials said the proposed funding cuts come just as the need for legal aid services is increasing, given the growing number of cases involving foreclosure, unemployment, landlord-tenant disputes, domestic violence and other civil legal matters related to the slow economic recovery.
"We seem caught in a perfect storm," LSC Board Chairman John G. Levi said in a statement after the Senate committee's proposal. "The Congress faces a tough budget environment. The poverty population is growing. Requests from low-income Americans for civil legal assistance are increasing. Other sources of legal aid funding are declining. Legal aid offices are stretched thin and laying off attorneys and staff because of funding shortfalls."
Published: Mon, Sep 26, 2011
headlines Jackson County
- JAEPC Meeting
- Safe storage law takes aim at gun violence epidemic
- Thrill of summer carnival rides holds inherent risks for riders; inspections, safety guidelines vary by state
- Michigan Appellate Assigned Counsel System (MAACS) accepting applications to join the roster; the deadline is September 13
- Ambs Call Center wins ATSI Award of Excellence
headlines National
- Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker will speak at ABA Annual Meeting
- 7 steps to successful crisis management
- Beyond Traditional Tools: Leveraging AI for efficient law practice management
- Punishing first grader for ‘Black Lives Mater’ drawing violates First Amendment, appeal argues
- 97-year-old federal appeals judge should be suspended another year for exam refusal, panel says
- How ShareFile helps firms keep pace with changes in law practice