––––––––––––––––––––
Subscribe to the Legal News!
https://legalnews.com/Home/Subscription
Full access to public notices, articles, columns, archives, statistics, calendar and more
Day Pass Only $4.95!
One-County $80/year
Three-County & Full Pass also available
- Posted September 06, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Top Del. Court OKs record $300M attorney fee award
By Martha Neil
American Bar Association
In an en banc decision Monday, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld a record $300 million attorney fee award in a shareholder derivative suit.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, which handled the appeal, argued that Chancellor Leo E. Strine Jr., who serves as chief judge of the state's highly regarded chancery court, abused his discretion by awarding an amount that pays the plaintiff's lawyers over $35,000 per hour, recounts the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.
However, the supreme court, in a 4-1 opinion (PDF) written by Justice Randy Holland, backed Strine's judgment. "The challenge of quantifying fee awards is entrusted to the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of capriciousness or factual findings that are clearly wrong," the opinion states.
The attorney fee award in the Southern Peru Copper Co. case reportedly is the largest amount ever approved in a shareholder derivative action. The case concerned a claimed sweetheart deal by the company's biggest shareholder to sell one of its own holdings to Southern Peru Copper in exchange for company stock that had risen significantly in value by the time the transaction concluded.
Strine said at a December hearing that corporate lawyers, like investment bankers, sometimes deserve a big payday, the newspaper reports.
''There's an idea that when a lawyer or law firms are going to get a big payment, that there's something somehow wrong about that, just because it's a lawyer. I'm sorry, but investment banks have hit it big, a lot of the bigger plaintiffs' lawyer firms have hit it big. They've hit it big many times,'' said Strine. ''And to me, envy is not an appropriate motivation to take into account when you set an attorney fee. It's not.''
A petition for a rehearing is unlikely, since the full court decided the appeal, but it's possible that an appeal will be made to the U.S. Supreme Court, the newspaper notes.
Law firms Prickett, Jones & Elliott of Wilmington, Del., and Pennsylvania-based Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check represented the plaintiffs in the case.
Published: Thu, Sep 6, 2012
headlines Ingham County
- Four takeaways from the former President of the European Court of Human Rights
- State Bar President aims to strengthen services
- Michigan Law launches AI Advisory Council, convenes inaugural meeting
- There is always an ‘alternative’ to service mandate
- State Bar of Michigan launches MiLawyer Podcast to help attorneys improve their practice and protect their well-being
headlines National
- Play-Based Learning: Can simulation games help lawyers learn management and business development skills?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Court orders hospital to resume gender-affirming care for transgender kids
- Netflix’s ‘The Lincoln Lawyer’ will rest his case at end of season 5
- Woman gives birth during arraignment in NYC courtroom
- SCOTUS will examine scope of Title IX protections and whether civil rights law covers work bias claims




