The Michigan Supreme Court has issued an order seeking public comment on proposed amendments to court rules that would codify existing statutory and caselaw requirements related to the issue of “Ability to Pay.” The amendments would require a court to make a finding about whether a defendant is able to comply with an order to pay without “manifest hardship,” would incorporate specific criteria to be considered by the court in making that finding, and would explicitly allow courts to impose alternative payment options. The suggested amendments were proposed by the Michigan State Planning Body for the Delivery of Legal Services to the Poor.
Bearden v Georgia, 461 US 660 (1983), established that incarcerating an individual for failure to pay without first determining whether the individual has the ability to pay fines, fees, and costs is a violation of the person’s constitutional rights. More recently, in response to Michigan judges asking for guidance on how and when to determine ability to pay, the State Court Administrative Office established an Ability to Pay workgroup made up of circuit and district judges, court administrators, indigent defense experts, and other stakeholders, which discussed ways to help courts address this issue.
The Ability to Pay workgroup report was published and distributed to courts and other interested parties early this year. The document included extensive resources for courts, including:
• Ability to Pay Checklists
• Statutory Requirements
• Court Rule Requirements
• Case Law Summary
• Ability to Pay Language
• Payment Plan Calculators
• Federal Poverty Guidelines Charts
• Means Test
• Payment Alternatives
• Incentives/Waivers
• Model Debt Inactivation Policy
The proposed amendments would supplement these other tools provided in the Ability to Pay workgroup report. Comments from the public on the proposed court rule amendments will help the Court decide whether the proposed changes should be adopted, changed before adoption, or rejected.
To comment, write to: ADMcomment@courts.mi.gov; or write to: Office of Administrative Counsel, PO Box 30052, Lansing, 48909. The deadline is March 1, 2016.
- Posted December 31, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
'Ability to Pay' amendments to court rules published for public comment
headlines Washtenaw County
- Ask the expert: Who are hospital ethics consultants?
- Sinas Dramis celebrates successful Lids for Kids events in Lansing and Grand Rapids
- MSU Law leads nation in Rural Summer Legal Corps participation
- Assistant Public Defender heeds advice from late Justice Ginsburg
- Two national voices to headline Cooley Innocence Project’s 25th Anniversary Gala
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




