Foster Swift was included in the 2019 U.S. News – Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” list as a Tier 1 Law firm in 27 practice areas. Foster Swift’s Lansing office was awarded 21 Tier 1 ranked practice areas, with four more Tier 1 rankings going to the Grand Rapids office and two for the Southfield office. Overall, the firm was ranked in 49 practice areas on the 2019 list.
Visit bestlawfirms.usnews.com to view Foster Swift’s 2019 “Best Law Firms” rankings in their entirety.
The U.S. News – Best Lawyers “Best Law Firms” rankings are based on a rigorous evaluation process. The process includes the collection of client and lawyer evaluations, peer review and review of additional information provided by law firms regarding demographic and background information on the firm and its attorneys.
To be considered for inclusion on the list, a law firm must have at least one attorney who is recognized in the current edition of Best Lawyers in a “Best Law Firms” ranked practice area / metro area—Foster Swift had 45 lawyers listed in the 2019 edition of Best Lawyers.
- Posted November 15, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Foster Swift rated Tier 1 in 27 practice areas in Best Lawyers 'Best Law Firms'
headlines Ingham County
- ABA report finds women lawyers face persistent barriers
- Barbara J. Howard of Cincinnati becomes American Bar Association president
- There is no workplace ‘kumbaya’ moment via screens and monitors
- Ask the expert: Indigenous science fiction explained
- Retired Judge Timothy P. Connors to receive State Bar of Michigan’s ‘Hero of ADR’ Award
headlines National
- Legal writers can benefit from a Zen writing approach and some Hemingway—and so can their readers
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Why the next competitive advantage in the AI era is partnership, not just technology
- Things I wish my spouse had told me before they died
- Troutman Pepper Locke associate files discrimination lawsuit against firm
- Jay-Z’s extortion suit against lawyer in withdrawn rape case faces skepticism from judge




