By David M. Tang
BridgeTower Media Newswires
This summer, I am mentoring and coordinating assignments for a rising 3L at the University at Buffalo School of Law, who returned to our law firm for a second year as a summer associate. During quieter periods, we have discussed how discrete research and writing projects fit into the larger proceeding of a pending case and, in those moments, I have had an opportunity to reflect on advice I received as a young litigator.
This reflection dovetailed with a program I attended at the annual gathering of the bankruptcy bars of the Western District of New York.
Attendees were invited to submit questions to a panel of bankruptcy judges, who answered questions after lunch.
This article offers a sampling of what the bankruptcy judges shared, as well as select advice received from trusted mentors during my early days of law training.
Good writing counts. “Aim for brief, concise, pithy.” Those were the words of instruction I received on my first motion drafting assignment. I was reminded of that exchange with a senior litigation partner — which occurred nearly 15 years ago — during the recent afternoon Q&A session when Chief Judge Bucki responded to the question of what advice would the judges give to young practitioners. Judge Bucki responded, “Brevity is important.”
The judge continued by saying that every time he looks at court papers, he thinks about someone having had to pay for the submission. To the extent possible, the chief judge would like to keep costs out of the justice equation. The response struck me as a variation on a theme of similar advice from Abraham Lincoln who, in an 1850’s lecture to law students, said that although the law may be a profitable profession, “Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point out to them how often the nominal winner is a real loser — in fees, expenses and waste of time. As a peacemaker, the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. There will still be business enough.”
First impressions count. “If your name is on papers and you are unknown to the Court, lots of first impressions will be made on the quality of your written submission. Be obsessive regarding the quality of the papers you send into Court.” — Judge Robert E. Littlefield, Jr., U.S. Bankruptcy judge for the Northern District of New York.
Judge Littlefield’s comment resonated as I thought back to my legal writing professor’s oft-repeated maxim, “There is no such thing as good writing, only good rewriting.” In 14 years of practice, I have yet to find an exception to this principle.
Use correct form. “Use a separate memo of law in pleading form when submitting argument to the court. Do not cite law in affidavits or in letters.”—Judge Paul R. Warren, U.S. Bankruptcy judge for the Western District of New York.
Effective advocacy involves good form and accuracy. “If you’re going to cite a case as authority, be sure any quote is thoroughly vetted and proofread.” — Judge Michael J. Kaplan, U.S. Bankruptcy judge for the Western District of New York.
Judge Kaplan advised he does not appreciate it when authority is cited, and the Court goes to look up the case and finds the proposition cited does not actually square with that for which the brief says it stands.
Pro bono matters. “Have new lawyers take one, two or three cases through VLSP. It is a practice opportunity, and it will give the lawyer a chance to see what debtors are actually going through.” — Judge Bucki.
I agree with the judge. Good quality pro bono helped me to develop as a lawyer and as a person. VLSP cases provided firsthand experience delivering news — both good and bad — to clients. My first argument in federal court was on a motion for summary judgment on an assigned civil rights case. My preparation for oral argument on multiple interesting questions of law served as a good data point regarding how much preparation is required for good, effective argument.
Civility counts. Finally, Judge Littlefield offered a concise reminder for a time when participants in public discourse seem to be increasingly challenged to work constructively and disagree respectfully. “Be civil. You can still be an effective advocate and be civil.”
—————
David M. Tang is a partner in Underberg & Kessler’s Litigation, Health Care and Creditors’ Rights Practice Groups. He concentrates his practice in litigation, commercial restructuring and corporate collections.
