At oral arguments on July 17, the office of the Michigan Attorney General will have lawyers giving oral argument both in support of and opposition to the constitutionality of the “Adopt and Amend” process. The oral arguments are being held at the Michigan Supreme Court building in Lansing.
On April 3, 2019, the Michigan Supreme Court (MSC) directed the Department of Attorney General to file two separate briefs on the constitutionality of the adopt and amend process, making arguments both for and against it. The brief in support of the process was filed by Deputy Solicitor General Restuccia on May 15 and the brief in opposition was filed by Solicitor General Hammoud on June 19.
A request for an advisory opinion from the Michigan Supreme Court was made by the Michigan House and Senate after the Legislature’s adoption of two ballot measures that made changes to Michigan’s minimum wage and earned sick time laws. Amendments to those laws were passed in lame duck that same year.
Although Sen. Stephanie Chang submitted a formal opinion request to the Department of Attorney General, the department has held off on issuing an opinion on the matter that is now before the MSC.
Due to its unique role as the People’s attorney, the Department of Attorney General often acts as a legal advocate on different sides of a given issue while safeguarding the integrity of each side.
- Posted July 17, 2019
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
AG office will make arguments on both sides of 'Adopt and Amend' process at Supreme Court
headlines Grand Rapids
- AALS report: It’s tough for women lawyers seeking top college jobs
- Teen earns two diplomas, law school scholarship
- Duly Noted
- 5Qs: Michigan Law professor discusses the ‘radical’ structure of the Fair Housing Act
- ABA Civil Rights and Social Justice Section to celebrate 60th anniversary with film competition
headlines National
- Inter American University of Puerto Rico School of Law back in compliance with ABA standard
- Chemerinsky: The Fourth Amendment comes back to the Supreme Court
- Reinstatement of retired judge reversed by state supreme court
- Mass tort lawyer suspended for 3 years for lying to clients
- Law firms in Minneapolis are helping lawyers, staff navigate unrest
- Federal judge faces trial on charges of being ‘super drunk’ while driving




