Columns
Legal People ...
January 24 ,2025
Butzel attorney and shareholder Michael C. Decker has
been appointed Co-Practice Department Chair for Litigation, alongside
attorneys George B. Donnini and Bruce L. Sendek. Butzel’s Litigation and
Dispute Resolution Practice Department represents clients in a range of
complex issues and areas of litigation.
:
Butzel attorney and shareholder Michael C. Decker has
been appointed Co-Practice Department Chair for Litigation, alongside
attorneys George B. Donnini and Bruce L. Sendek. Butzel’s Litigation and
Dispute Resolution Practice Department represents clients in a range of
complex issues and areas of litigation.
Based in Butzel’s Troy office, Decker concentrates his practice in the areas of construction and construction litigation.
Decker represents and counsels construction companies and contractors on all aspects of both public and private projects, from inception to completion. He has experience drafting and negotiating contracts, subcontracts, and other agreements and prosecuting and defending performance, payment, and delay related claims on behalf of construction companies and contractors, as well as owners and sureties.
He has experience prosecuting and defending claims concerning the Miss Dig Act and violations on behalf of construction companies and contractors. He has prosecuted and defended such claims before state and federal courts, state and public agencies, and arbitration and mediation panels.
Decker has experience assisting owners and contractors with residential construction related matters. Specifically, he has assisted owners and contractors drafting and negotiating residential construction contracts, subcontracts, and other agreements and resolving performance and payment related issues, as well as prosecuting and defending claims.
He also represents and counsels businesses and business professionals with day-to-day business-related issues.
Decker has been recognized as a Rising Star in Business Litigation in 2013-2024 by Super Lawyers. He has been recognized as a Top Lawyer in Construction Litigation in 2017-2025 by DBusiness.
He is a graduate of Wayne State University Law School (2011). He received a Bachelor of Science from Central Michigan University in 2007.
Decker is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and the State Bar of Florida. He is admitted to practice in various courts in both Michigan and Florida.
• • •
Dickinson Wright is pleased to announce the election of new member attorneys in the firm’s Detroit and Troy offices effective January 1.
Below are Dickinson Wright’s local new member attorneys for 2025:
Jared Christensen is a member in the firm’s Detroit office. He focuses his practice on complex commercial and business litigation with experience in a variety of areas, including, shareholder and member disputes, automotive litigation, trade secret and non-compete litigation, consumer credit disputes and fraud cases, banking litigation, and other general commercial litigation and arbitration. Christensen is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and serves as a member of the Governing Council of the Litigation Section. He also serves in the capacity of general counsel for a number of K-12 and other education clients, providing a wide range of legal services, including policy formation, risk-mitigation, regulatory compliance, labor negotiation, employment counseling and litigation, and commercial litigation.
Erin Cobane is a member in the firm’s Troy office. She focuses her practice on real estate. She counsels clients on diverse corporate real estate projects across the country, encompassing purchase and sale transactions, leasing agreements, entitlements and land use/zoning issues, environmental matters, and construction projects. She is a member of the Oakland County Bar Association and the Women Lawyers Association of Michigan. Cobane received her B.A. from the University of Michigan and her law degree from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.
Callie Root is a member in the firm’s Troy office. She concentrates her practice on mergers and acquisitions, transactional tax matters, and private equity. She is a member of the State Bar of Michigan’s Corporate, Business Law, and Taxation sections, and is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association. Root received her B.A. from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, her law degrees from the University of Oklahoma School of Law and Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
• • •
Nicholas Schroeck has been named the next dean of the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. While the university conducted a national dean search, Schroeck served as interim dean. He is a leader in legal education, an environmental law expert, and a member of the State Bar of Michigan.
Schroeck joined the faculty in 2018. In his prior role as associate dean for experiential education, he served on the School of Law’s leadership team, led the clinical program and externship program, and secured support for the experiential education programs from community partners, alumni, and friends of Detroit Mercy Law.
Schroeck has been a member of the State Bar of Michigan throughout his legal career. His practice supports communities in and around Detroit and the transnational Great Lakes region. The Michigan State Bar Foundation named him a 2024 Fellow in recognition of his leadership, professional excellence, and service to the community.
As a sought-after environmental law expert, his scholarship includes more than 100 publications, presentations, and media appearances on legal issues impacting environmental justice. His research focuses on reducing air and water pollution, promoting mass transportation, and advancing citizen suit enforcement of environmental laws.
After joining Detroit Mercy Law, Schroeck launched the environmental law clinic and also taught upper-level environmental law courses. Through his clinical work, Schroeck has litigated cases for several prominent environmental advocacy organizations and strengthened local, state, and federal environmental protections through policy advocacy.
Prior to joining academia, he worked with the Great Lakes Environmental Law Center, the National Wildlife Federation, and the Great Lakes Commission. During the Flint Water Crisis, the Genesee County Prosecutor’s Office named him a special assistant prosecutor to aid in their investigations.
“I am proud to serve as dean of Detroit Mercy Law,” stated Schroeck. “The mission of educating the complete lawyer in the Jesuit and Mercy traditions brought me to Detroit Mercy Law and continues to inspire me. We will continue to lean into our mission and traditions as we work with a renewed focus on training the next generation of complete lawyers to serve clients and our community in the pursuit of justice.”
• • •
Foley, Baron, Metzger, & Juip PLLC is pleased to announce the election of attorney Brian J. Richtarcik into the membership of the firm, effective January 1.
Richtarcik is a trial and appellate attorney with more than 20 years of experience in private practice. He maintains a practice defending healthcare providers in civil rights claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983, particularly focusing on healthcare delivery in county jails and state prisons. He also has experience representing healthcare professionals, including physicians, mid-level medical providers, and nurses in medical malpractice litigation.
Since 1997, Richtarcik has built an appellate practice, regularly appearing before both the Michigan Court of Appeals and the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. His practice also encompasses complex civil litigation, business transactions and litigation, real estate matters, estate planning, and employment law.
• • •
The shareholders of Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC have elected Bryan Cermak to shareholder as the firm enters 2025.
Cermak practices in the firm’s Southfield office as a trial lawyer and is a former general counsel for an international, publicly traded company. He litigates business disputes and other commercial and complex cases, and he serves his corporate clients as a comprehensive legal, risk management and business advisor.
Cermak joined the firm in April 2023 as a then lateral hire. Cermak also hosts a video series titled “Life, Law & Lessons.”
• • •
Kemp Klein is pleased to announce that Kemp Klein Shareholder and Chairman Emeritus Ralph A. Castelli was named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s “Go To Lawyers” Commercial Real Estate List.
Castelli focuses his practice on business and real estate transactions as well as estate planning and general corporate law. He is a negotiator who analyzes and problem solves complicated issues and uses his decades of experience to prevail on behalf of his clients.
Castelli maintains an “AV” peer review rating with Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory. He has also been listed as one of the top 5% of attorneys in Michigan by Super Lawyers Magazine. In 2025 The Best Lawyers in America® recognized Castelli as a Best Lawyer for his work in Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, and Trusts and Estates. Castelli has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® since 2013. He was named Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in America® in 2019. He was recognized by DBusiness Magazine as a 2025 DBusiness Top Lawyer for his work in Corporate Law. In Addition, Castelli was named to the “Leaders in Law” Class of 2018 by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
• • •
Varnum attorney Kathryn Ahlbrand has been appointed to the Council of the Young Lawyers Section of the State Bar of Michigan.
Established in 1940, the Young Lawyers Section provides education, information and analysis on issues of particular interest and value to young lawyers through meetings, seminars, public service initiatives and more.
As a member of the Tax Planning, Compliance, and Litigation Team at Varnum, Ahlbrand’s practice includes audit support and tax compliance. She also advises clients on tax issues regarding mergers and acquisitions,
restructurings, integrations and operating model effectiveness.
Her experience involves overseeing quarterly international tax reporting and audit engagements for multinational corporations in accordance with U.S. GAAP as well as handling tax compliance matters including returns and informational reporting for international entities. Additionally, she has supported the tax-free spin-off of a major automotive mobility company, providing guidance through challenging transitions.
Ahlbrand graduated from Michigan State University College of Law and earned her undergraduate degree from Wayne State University.
• • •
Burris Law is pleased to share that founder and owner Kelly Burris has been reappointed by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer to the Western Michigan University (WMU) Board of Trustees. Burris’ new term began on January 1, 2025, and extends through December 31, 2032.
Burris earned a Bachelor of Science in Aeronautical Engineering from WMU, among her other advanced degrees in materials science and law.
“I am deeply honored to continue serving on the Western Michigan University Board of Trustees,” said Burris. “As an alumna, this role holds special meaning for me, and I look forward to supporting WMU’s commitment to innovation, education, athletics, and excellence. Together, we will continue to provide educational opportunities to underrepresented communities and empower the next generation of leaders.”
• • •
Dykema recently announced that the firm’s Detroit office will relocate to One Kennedy Square. The building is located at 777 Woodward Avenue adjacent to Campus Martius Park in the heart of Downtown Detroit’s Central Business District. Dykema’s new office will house nearly 100 attorneys and staff in approximately 25,701 square feet of office space. The firm expects to move into the new location by late Summer 2025.
“Dykema’s move back to the Central Business District is an important milestone for the firm and we appreciate the dedication and expertise of the REDICO team in making the experience as seamless as possible,” said Len Wolfe, Dykema’s chair and CEO. “This move reflects our commitment to remain a vibrant part of the City of Detroit, and we are thrilled to be a part of the downtown business community as we plan for our centennial anniversary next year. We are proud of our long-standing history in Detroit and are excited to continue contributing to the city’s revitalization and growth.”
Dykema’s Detroit office move aligns with other recent and pending office developments in other markets, all with a focus on flexible, functional space and anticipated future growth. The firm’s Bloomfield Hills office is set to relocate to a new office building in Birmingham in late 2025.
Dykema also announced that its Executive Board elected Connor Walby and Ryan Warsh of the Bloomfield Hills office as new members to the firm effective January 1.
Walby, Product Liability and Class Action Litigation, is a litigator who defends automotive manufacturers and corporate entities in complex product liability, general liability, and commercial litigation. He represents Fortune 100 companies and their complex products across the country with a focus on the design and manufacture of motor vehicles.
Walby also coordinated consumer warranty and discovery matters across several jurisdictions, including California, represented the world’s largest franchisor in leasing, real estate, and franchising disputes, and defended a large waste management corporation in various environmental matters.
Walby earned a law degree from Wayne State University Law School and a B.A. from James Madison College at Michigan State University.
Warsh, Real Estate, focuses his practice on a range of real estate matters, including acquisitions and dispositions, financing, and commercial leasing. Her clients are made up of lenders and borrowers, buyers and sellers, landlords, tenants, and real estate developers.
Warsh has experience in a variety of transactional areas, including industrial, retail, multifamily, office, and healthcare. She also advises members of the firm’s corporate practice group on the real estate components of mergers, acquisitions, and other similar types of transactions.
Warsh earned a law degree and a B.A. from the University of Michigan.
• • •
Several local Clark Hill attorneys have been named 2025 Leading Lawyers:
—Birmingham
Dana L Abrahams
Jennifer A. Bielfield
Paul W. Coughenour
William B. Dunn
John L. Gierak
Randi P. Glanz
Edward C. Hammond
Douglas R. Kelly
Peter B. Kupelian
J. Thomas MacFarlane
Paul S. Magy
Daniel H. Minkus
Charles E. Murphy
Thomas F. Sweeney
Linda M. Watson
Anne-Marie V. Welch
—Detroit
Anthony A. Agosta
William G Asimakis Jr.
Fred W. Batten
Jay M. Berger
Daniel J. Bretz
Connie M. Cessante
David M. Cessante
Martin E. Crandall
Thomas M. Dixon
Daniel J. Dulworth
Maria Fracassa Dwyer
Peter S. Ecklund Jr.
Cynthia M. Filipovich
David M. Hayes
Kevin S. Hendrick
John J. Hern, Jr.
Edward J. Hood
Thomas M. Keranen
Christopher A McMican
William A. Moore
Michael P. Nowlan
Daniel J. Scully
Richard A. Sundquist
Duane L. Tarnacki
Christopher M. Trebilcock
Timothy D. Wittlinger
• • •
Kitch Attorneys & Counselors is pleased to announce the promotion of several attorneys:
—Principal
Brett Asher, Mt. Clemens
Francisco Lozano, Mt. Clemens
—Associate Principal
Arooj Anjum, Mt. Clemens
Christian Graziani, Mt. Clemens
Brittany Lawler, Mt. Clemens
—Senior Associate
Laura DeMarco, Detroit
Samantha Norris, Mt. Clemens
• • •
Howard & Howard is pleased to welcome Ronald Gardner to the firm. He will join the business and corporate practice group in the Royal Oak office.
With more than 40 years of experience, Gardner has built a career in trust and estate planning. He has established himself as a practitioner in the areas of trusts, estates, and estate planning, working with both individuals and corporate fiduciaries. His experience includes managing and distributing trusts and estates of varying sizes, from insolvent estates to those exceeding $10 million. Additionally, he represents beneficiaries of trusts and estates, ensuring their interests are well-protected.
Gardner started his career at Ann Arbor Trust Co. where he served as an assistant vice-president and trust officer from 1975 to 1984. During his nine-year tenure, he administered trusts, guardianships, and estates, gaining invaluable experience in fiduciary responsibilities. He then practiced law as an associate with a local Ann Arbor firm, specializing in estate planning and trust and estate administration.
In 1997, Gardner founded Gardner and Associates PC, a firm dedicated to providing comprehensive legal services in trusts, estates, and estate planning.
Gardner graduated from Michigan State University with his bachelor’s degree and earned his law degree from the University of Detroit School of Law.
• • •
Brooks Kushman attorney Bryan Hart was recently appointed as vice chair of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee of the Intellectual Property Owner Association (IPO) for 2025 by the IPO Board.
The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee includes several members from across the country who focus on diversity issues and related matters. As vice chair, Hart will help maintain organizational focus around and execution of diversity and inclusion programming offered by the committee. Hart has been active within IPO for many years and has previously held the role of secretary in the committee.
Hart specializes in all areas of patent law, with a focus on preparing and prosecuting patent applications in mechanical, electrical, and software technologies. He has handled numerous applications across diverse fields, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, machine vision, robotics, vehicle sensor cleaning, airbags, and additive manufacturing. His litigation experience spans federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, and inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
• • •
Collins Einhorn Farrell is pleased to announce that attorneys Laura A. Alton and Erin J. Rodenhouse have been elected partners in the firm.
Alton is a partner in the firm’s Transporation Liability practice group. Her individual practice focuses on first-and third-party automotive defense and other general liability matters. Alton’s experience includes no-fault, commercial litigation, premises liability, construction accident & defect liability, and immigration law.
Rodenhouse is a partner in the firm’s Appellate practice group. Her individual practice focuses on appeals in legal malpractice, insurance coverage, disciplinary matters, general liability, and auto-negligence cases. Rodenhouse practices in Michigan’s appellate courts and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
• • •
Harness IP is pleased to announce that patent attorney Jennie Turchyn, Detroit Metro office, has been elected as a principal in the firm.
Concentrating on preparing and prosecuting patent applications in the mechanical, electromechanical, and chemical arts, Turchyn’s practice is dedicated to helping clients maximize the value of their innovations. She has an understanding of the necessity and opportunity that strong IP protections provide at every stage of development.
• • •
Maddin Hauser is pleased to announce that Michael J. Hamblin has joined the firm. Hamblin’s experience encompasses a range of business and real estate litigation. Throughout his nearly 25 years of practice, he has handled an array of litigation, including partnership and shareholder disputes, minority shareholder oppression, Michigan sales commission disputes, breach of contract, and real estate disputes. Hamblin joins the firm’s litigation and risk advisory and employment and workforce management practice groups.
Hamblin has appeared in state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He earned his law degree from Wayne State University Law School.
Maddin Hauser is also pleased to announce that Michigan Lawyers Weekly named Steven D. Sallen a “Go-To” lawyer in commercial real estate for the second time. Sallen was previously recognized in 2021 and selected for Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s Hall of Fame in 2020. He has been recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers, Leading Lawyers, and DBusiness Top Lawyers.
Sallen has enjoyed a distinguished career at Maddin Hauser, serving as president, CEO, Environmental Law Group chair, and Real Estate Practice Group co-chair. He concentrates his practice in real estate, environmental, and corporate law.
In a very personal project for Maddin Hauser, Sallen negotiated the long-term lease for a new Class A office location. The firm’s historic 2024 move occurred following nearly forty years in their former location.
Sallen developed the Commission-Safe® Marketing Program, a proven system of re-useable tools and checklists, training, and consulting for commercial real estate brokers. Many Southeast Michigan premier brokers have adopted the system since its creation in 2009.
Based in Butzel’s Troy office, Decker concentrates his practice in the areas of construction and construction litigation.
Decker represents and counsels construction companies and contractors on all aspects of both public and private projects, from inception to completion. He has experience drafting and negotiating contracts, subcontracts, and other agreements and prosecuting and defending performance, payment, and delay related claims on behalf of construction companies and contractors, as well as owners and sureties.
He has experience prosecuting and defending claims concerning the Miss Dig Act and violations on behalf of construction companies and contractors. He has prosecuted and defended such claims before state and federal courts, state and public agencies, and arbitration and mediation panels.
Decker has experience assisting owners and contractors with residential construction related matters. Specifically, he has assisted owners and contractors drafting and negotiating residential construction contracts, subcontracts, and other agreements and resolving performance and payment related issues, as well as prosecuting and defending claims.
He also represents and counsels businesses and business professionals with day-to-day business-related issues.
Decker has been recognized as a Rising Star in Business Litigation in 2013-2024 by Super Lawyers. He has been recognized as a Top Lawyer in Construction Litigation in 2017-2025 by DBusiness.
He is a graduate of Wayne State University Law School (2011). He received a Bachelor of Science from Central Michigan University in 2007.
Decker is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and the State Bar of Florida. He is admitted to practice in various courts in both Michigan and Florida.
• • •
Dickinson Wright is pleased to announce the election of new member attorneys in the firm’s Detroit and Troy offices effective January 1.
Below are Dickinson Wright’s local new member attorneys for 2025:
Jared Christensen is a member in the firm’s Detroit office. He focuses his practice on complex commercial and business litigation with experience in a variety of areas, including, shareholder and member disputes, automotive litigation, trade secret and non-compete litigation, consumer credit disputes and fraud cases, banking litigation, and other general commercial litigation and arbitration. Christensen is a member of the State Bar of Michigan and serves as a member of the Governing Council of the Litigation Section. He also serves in the capacity of general counsel for a number of K-12 and other education clients, providing a wide range of legal services, including policy formation, risk-mitigation, regulatory compliance, labor negotiation, employment counseling and litigation, and commercial litigation.
Erin Cobane is a member in the firm’s Troy office. She focuses her practice on real estate. She counsels clients on diverse corporate real estate projects across the country, encompassing purchase and sale transactions, leasing agreements, entitlements and land use/zoning issues, environmental matters, and construction projects. She is a member of the Oakland County Bar Association and the Women Lawyers Association of Michigan. Cobane received her B.A. from the University of Michigan and her law degree from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.
Callie Root is a member in the firm’s Troy office. She concentrates her practice on mergers and acquisitions, transactional tax matters, and private equity. She is a member of the State Bar of Michigan’s Corporate, Business Law, and Taxation sections, and is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association. Root received her B.A. from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, her law degrees from the University of Oklahoma School of Law and Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law.
• • •
Nicholas Schroeck has been named the next dean of the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. While the university conducted a national dean search, Schroeck served as interim dean. He is a leader in legal education, an environmental law expert, and a member of the State Bar of Michigan.
Schroeck joined the faculty in 2018. In his prior role as associate dean for experiential education, he served on the School of Law’s leadership team, led the clinical program and externship program, and secured support for the experiential education programs from community partners, alumni, and friends of Detroit Mercy Law.
Schroeck has been a member of the State Bar of Michigan throughout his legal career. His practice supports communities in and around Detroit and the transnational Great Lakes region. The Michigan State Bar Foundation named him a 2024 Fellow in recognition of his leadership, professional excellence, and service to the community.
As a sought-after environmental law expert, his scholarship includes more than 100 publications, presentations, and media appearances on legal issues impacting environmental justice. His research focuses on reducing air and water pollution, promoting mass transportation, and advancing citizen suit enforcement of environmental laws.
After joining Detroit Mercy Law, Schroeck launched the environmental law clinic and also taught upper-level environmental law courses. Through his clinical work, Schroeck has litigated cases for several prominent environmental advocacy organizations and strengthened local, state, and federal environmental protections through policy advocacy.
Prior to joining academia, he worked with the Great Lakes Environmental Law Center, the National Wildlife Federation, and the Great Lakes Commission. During the Flint Water Crisis, the Genesee County Prosecutor’s Office named him a special assistant prosecutor to aid in their investigations.
“I am proud to serve as dean of Detroit Mercy Law,” stated Schroeck. “The mission of educating the complete lawyer in the Jesuit and Mercy traditions brought me to Detroit Mercy Law and continues to inspire me. We will continue to lean into our mission and traditions as we work with a renewed focus on training the next generation of complete lawyers to serve clients and our community in the pursuit of justice.”
• • •
Foley, Baron, Metzger, & Juip PLLC is pleased to announce the election of attorney Brian J. Richtarcik into the membership of the firm, effective January 1.
Richtarcik is a trial and appellate attorney with more than 20 years of experience in private practice. He maintains a practice defending healthcare providers in civil rights claims brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983, particularly focusing on healthcare delivery in county jails and state prisons. He also has experience representing healthcare professionals, including physicians, mid-level medical providers, and nurses in medical malpractice litigation.
Since 1997, Richtarcik has built an appellate practice, regularly appearing before both the Michigan Court of Appeals and the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. His practice also encompasses complex civil litigation, business transactions and litigation, real estate matters, estate planning, and employment law.
• • •
The shareholders of Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC have elected Bryan Cermak to shareholder as the firm enters 2025.
Cermak practices in the firm’s Southfield office as a trial lawyer and is a former general counsel for an international, publicly traded company. He litigates business disputes and other commercial and complex cases, and he serves his corporate clients as a comprehensive legal, risk management and business advisor.
Cermak joined the firm in April 2023 as a then lateral hire. Cermak also hosts a video series titled “Life, Law & Lessons.”
• • •
Kemp Klein is pleased to announce that Kemp Klein Shareholder and Chairman Emeritus Ralph A. Castelli was named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s “Go To Lawyers” Commercial Real Estate List.
Castelli focuses his practice on business and real estate transactions as well as estate planning and general corporate law. He is a negotiator who analyzes and problem solves complicated issues and uses his decades of experience to prevail on behalf of his clients.
Castelli maintains an “AV” peer review rating with Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory. He has also been listed as one of the top 5% of attorneys in Michigan by Super Lawyers Magazine. In 2025 The Best Lawyers in America® recognized Castelli as a Best Lawyer for his work in Corporate Law, Real Estate Law, and Trusts and Estates. Castelli has been recognized by The Best Lawyers in America® since 2013. He was named Lawyer of the Year by The Best Lawyers in America® in 2019. He was recognized by DBusiness Magazine as a 2025 DBusiness Top Lawyer for his work in Corporate Law. In Addition, Castelli was named to the “Leaders in Law” Class of 2018 by Michigan Lawyers Weekly.
• • •
Varnum attorney Kathryn Ahlbrand has been appointed to the Council of the Young Lawyers Section of the State Bar of Michigan.
Established in 1940, the Young Lawyers Section provides education, information and analysis on issues of particular interest and value to young lawyers through meetings, seminars, public service initiatives and more.
As a member of the Tax Planning, Compliance, and Litigation Team at Varnum, Ahlbrand’s practice includes audit support and tax compliance. She also advises clients on tax issues regarding mergers and acquisitions,
restructurings, integrations and operating model effectiveness.
Her experience involves overseeing quarterly international tax reporting and audit engagements for multinational corporations in accordance with U.S. GAAP as well as handling tax compliance matters including returns and informational reporting for international entities. Additionally, she has supported the tax-free spin-off of a major automotive mobility company, providing guidance through challenging transitions.
Ahlbrand graduated from Michigan State University College of Law and earned her undergraduate degree from Wayne State University.
• • •
Burris Law is pleased to share that founder and owner Kelly Burris has been reappointed by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer to the Western Michigan University (WMU) Board of Trustees. Burris’ new term began on January 1, 2025, and extends through December 31, 2032.
Burris earned a Bachelor of Science in Aeronautical Engineering from WMU, among her other advanced degrees in materials science and law.
“I am deeply honored to continue serving on the Western Michigan University Board of Trustees,” said Burris. “As an alumna, this role holds special meaning for me, and I look forward to supporting WMU’s commitment to innovation, education, athletics, and excellence. Together, we will continue to provide educational opportunities to underrepresented communities and empower the next generation of leaders.”
• • •
Dykema recently announced that the firm’s Detroit office will relocate to One Kennedy Square. The building is located at 777 Woodward Avenue adjacent to Campus Martius Park in the heart of Downtown Detroit’s Central Business District. Dykema’s new office will house nearly 100 attorneys and staff in approximately 25,701 square feet of office space. The firm expects to move into the new location by late Summer 2025.
“Dykema’s move back to the Central Business District is an important milestone for the firm and we appreciate the dedication and expertise of the REDICO team in making the experience as seamless as possible,” said Len Wolfe, Dykema’s chair and CEO. “This move reflects our commitment to remain a vibrant part of the City of Detroit, and we are thrilled to be a part of the downtown business community as we plan for our centennial anniversary next year. We are proud of our long-standing history in Detroit and are excited to continue contributing to the city’s revitalization and growth.”
Dykema’s Detroit office move aligns with other recent and pending office developments in other markets, all with a focus on flexible, functional space and anticipated future growth. The firm’s Bloomfield Hills office is set to relocate to a new office building in Birmingham in late 2025.
Dykema also announced that its Executive Board elected Connor Walby and Ryan Warsh of the Bloomfield Hills office as new members to the firm effective January 1.
Walby, Product Liability and Class Action Litigation, is a litigator who defends automotive manufacturers and corporate entities in complex product liability, general liability, and commercial litigation. He represents Fortune 100 companies and their complex products across the country with a focus on the design and manufacture of motor vehicles.
Walby also coordinated consumer warranty and discovery matters across several jurisdictions, including California, represented the world’s largest franchisor in leasing, real estate, and franchising disputes, and defended a large waste management corporation in various environmental matters.
Walby earned a law degree from Wayne State University Law School and a B.A. from James Madison College at Michigan State University.
Warsh, Real Estate, focuses his practice on a range of real estate matters, including acquisitions and dispositions, financing, and commercial leasing. Her clients are made up of lenders and borrowers, buyers and sellers, landlords, tenants, and real estate developers.
Warsh has experience in a variety of transactional areas, including industrial, retail, multifamily, office, and healthcare. She also advises members of the firm’s corporate practice group on the real estate components of mergers, acquisitions, and other similar types of transactions.
Warsh earned a law degree and a B.A. from the University of Michigan.
• • •
Several local Clark Hill attorneys have been named 2025 Leading Lawyers:
—Birmingham
Dana L Abrahams
Jennifer A. Bielfield
Paul W. Coughenour
William B. Dunn
John L. Gierak
Randi P. Glanz
Edward C. Hammond
Douglas R. Kelly
Peter B. Kupelian
J. Thomas MacFarlane
Paul S. Magy
Daniel H. Minkus
Charles E. Murphy
Thomas F. Sweeney
Linda M. Watson
Anne-Marie V. Welch
—Detroit
Anthony A. Agosta
William G Asimakis Jr.
Fred W. Batten
Jay M. Berger
Daniel J. Bretz
Connie M. Cessante
David M. Cessante
Martin E. Crandall
Thomas M. Dixon
Daniel J. Dulworth
Maria Fracassa Dwyer
Peter S. Ecklund Jr.
Cynthia M. Filipovich
David M. Hayes
Kevin S. Hendrick
John J. Hern, Jr.
Edward J. Hood
Thomas M. Keranen
Christopher A McMican
William A. Moore
Michael P. Nowlan
Daniel J. Scully
Richard A. Sundquist
Duane L. Tarnacki
Christopher M. Trebilcock
Timothy D. Wittlinger
• • •
Kitch Attorneys & Counselors is pleased to announce the promotion of several attorneys:
—Principal
Brett Asher, Mt. Clemens
Francisco Lozano, Mt. Clemens
—Associate Principal
Arooj Anjum, Mt. Clemens
Christian Graziani, Mt. Clemens
Brittany Lawler, Mt. Clemens
—Senior Associate
Laura DeMarco, Detroit
Samantha Norris, Mt. Clemens
• • •
Howard & Howard is pleased to welcome Ronald Gardner to the firm. He will join the business and corporate practice group in the Royal Oak office.
With more than 40 years of experience, Gardner has built a career in trust and estate planning. He has established himself as a practitioner in the areas of trusts, estates, and estate planning, working with both individuals and corporate fiduciaries. His experience includes managing and distributing trusts and estates of varying sizes, from insolvent estates to those exceeding $10 million. Additionally, he represents beneficiaries of trusts and estates, ensuring their interests are well-protected.
Gardner started his career at Ann Arbor Trust Co. where he served as an assistant vice-president and trust officer from 1975 to 1984. During his nine-year tenure, he administered trusts, guardianships, and estates, gaining invaluable experience in fiduciary responsibilities. He then practiced law as an associate with a local Ann Arbor firm, specializing in estate planning and trust and estate administration.
In 1997, Gardner founded Gardner and Associates PC, a firm dedicated to providing comprehensive legal services in trusts, estates, and estate planning.
Gardner graduated from Michigan State University with his bachelor’s degree and earned his law degree from the University of Detroit School of Law.
• • •
Brooks Kushman attorney Bryan Hart was recently appointed as vice chair of the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee of the Intellectual Property Owner Association (IPO) for 2025 by the IPO Board.
The Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee includes several members from across the country who focus on diversity issues and related matters. As vice chair, Hart will help maintain organizational focus around and execution of diversity and inclusion programming offered by the committee. Hart has been active within IPO for many years and has previously held the role of secretary in the committee.
Hart specializes in all areas of patent law, with a focus on preparing and prosecuting patent applications in mechanical, electrical, and software technologies. He has handled numerous applications across diverse fields, including artificial intelligence, machine learning, machine vision, robotics, vehicle sensor cleaning, airbags, and additive manufacturing. His litigation experience spans federal district courts, the International Trade Commission, and inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
• • •
Collins Einhorn Farrell is pleased to announce that attorneys Laura A. Alton and Erin J. Rodenhouse have been elected partners in the firm.
Alton is a partner in the firm’s Transporation Liability practice group. Her individual practice focuses on first-and third-party automotive defense and other general liability matters. Alton’s experience includes no-fault, commercial litigation, premises liability, construction accident & defect liability, and immigration law.
Rodenhouse is a partner in the firm’s Appellate practice group. Her individual practice focuses on appeals in legal malpractice, insurance coverage, disciplinary matters, general liability, and auto-negligence cases. Rodenhouse practices in Michigan’s appellate courts and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
• • •
Harness IP is pleased to announce that patent attorney Jennie Turchyn, Detroit Metro office, has been elected as a principal in the firm.
Concentrating on preparing and prosecuting patent applications in the mechanical, electromechanical, and chemical arts, Turchyn’s practice is dedicated to helping clients maximize the value of their innovations. She has an understanding of the necessity and opportunity that strong IP protections provide at every stage of development.
• • •
Maddin Hauser is pleased to announce that Michael J. Hamblin has joined the firm. Hamblin’s experience encompasses a range of business and real estate litigation. Throughout his nearly 25 years of practice, he has handled an array of litigation, including partnership and shareholder disputes, minority shareholder oppression, Michigan sales commission disputes, breach of contract, and real estate disputes. Hamblin joins the firm’s litigation and risk advisory and employment and workforce management practice groups.
Hamblin has appeared in state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. He earned his law degree from Wayne State University Law School.
Maddin Hauser is also pleased to announce that Michigan Lawyers Weekly named Steven D. Sallen a “Go-To” lawyer in commercial real estate for the second time. Sallen was previously recognized in 2021 and selected for Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s Hall of Fame in 2020. He has been recognized by Best Lawyers in America, Super Lawyers, Leading Lawyers, and DBusiness Top Lawyers.
Sallen has enjoyed a distinguished career at Maddin Hauser, serving as president, CEO, Environmental Law Group chair, and Real Estate Practice Group co-chair. He concentrates his practice in real estate, environmental, and corporate law.
In a very personal project for Maddin Hauser, Sallen negotiated the long-term lease for a new Class A office location. The firm’s historic 2024 move occurred following nearly forty years in their former location.
Sallen developed the Commission-Safe® Marketing Program, a proven system of re-useable tools and checklists, training, and consulting for commercial real estate brokers. Many Southeast Michigan premier brokers have adopted the system since its creation in 2009.
COMMENTARY: Art of fact-checking destined to remain an elusive concept
January 24 ,2025
It seems like the mainstream media is in the news as much these days as the people and events they cover.
:
By Berl Falbaum
It seems like the mainstream media is in the news as much these days as the people and events they cover.
First, within the last couple of weeks, we had Ann Telnaes, an editorial cartoonist resigning from The Washington Post, because she was offended when the paper rejected a cartoon that mocked the paper’s owner, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon. As I recently wrote, she gave the word “chutzpah” (Jewish for gall, audacity) an entirely new meaning.
Now come two new controversies. One involves The New York Times rejecting an advertisement and the other, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO, ending fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta platforms.
We’ll deal with The Times case first. The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), a Quaker organization, wanted to place an ad in the paper, calling for an end to Israel’s “genocide” in Gaza.
The Times refused the ad, suggesting that AFSC change “genocide” to “war” because, the paper said, “Various international bodies, human rights organizations and governments have different views on the situation. In line with our commitment to factual accuracy and adherence to legal standards, we must ensure that all advertising content complies with these widely applied definitions.”
AFSC huffed and puffed in a press release, asking: “Why is it not acceptable to publicize the meticulously documented atrocities committed by Israel and paid for by the United States?”
The answer: It is perfectly acceptable to publicize what AFSC considers Israel’s abuses in the war with Hamas, but The Times has no obligation — legal or otherwise — to provide the organization with a platform.
The Times is a private enterprise and like all media institutions makes literally thousands of decisions daily on what to publish, where to publish articles (page one or deep in the paper), or not to publish at all. And those decisions include advertisements.
Years ago, I had a go-around with the student newspaper at Brandeis University, a Jewish institution, when it published a Holocaust denier ad. The paper cited “freedom of the press” as its defense and I responded, the Holocaust deniers have a constitutional right to their views but the paper did not have to help them disseminate them.
The 10 words in the First Amendment devoted to freedom of the press — “Congress shall make no law respecting…freedom of the press…” — are designed to protect the press from government intervention. The remaining 35 words deal with freedom of religion, the right to assembly, and to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Under the guarantee of a free press, private organizations can make their decisions and as long as they don’t engage in libel or other violations (copyright infringements, invasion of privacy, etc.) they do not owe anyone an explanation.
I am going to guess that AFSC has a newsletter or magazine and that it would not publish an ad or article that defends Israel. And I support that right.
One more point: Press freedom applies to everyone not just media institutions. Even protesters distributing flyers at political rallies enjoy that protection.
(I thank my valued friend, former Detroit Congressman William Brodhead, for reminding me of that point after my column on Telnaes.)
Now, to Meta and fact-checking. Zuckerberg created a brouhaha with his announcement to end that practice. First, an admission: I am computer illiterate when it comes to social media. I have never Facebooked,
Headbooked, Toebooked, Instagrammed, Tweeted, Tiked or Toked. When my grandchildren ask me to text them, I seek help from the 4-year-old next door.
When the headlines screamed, “Meta Ends Fact-Checking,” I reacted with puzzlement. So what? Why? There are 1,279 daily newspapers and 5,147 weeklies in the U.S. (Source: Wikipedia) and I feel safe to say, none has any fact-checkers.
I understand that the mainstream media has filtering processes to assure accuracy while the social media does not. The latter is more like an international Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner (London) where anyone can hold forth and, agreed, extremely powerful in the internet era.
It is impossible to check the thousands of stories published by daily papers and, of course, do so in the few minutes before publication. Each organization would have to create duplicate staffs just to recheck all the facts in stories and if all the quotes were accurate. Simply not possible. Editors have no choice but to trust that their writers are reporting accurately. (And, overall, they perform admirably.)
Here is what the Columbia Journalism Review has said on fact-checking: “…[I]t is virtually impossible to rigorously report the day’s news, edit a story, and then hand it over to a fact-checker to be verified in time to print a paper the next day—or an article the next hour.”
When I was teaching journalism courses at Wayne State University, one of my standard assignments was for students to fact-check published stories. They were, at times, appalled by what they found. Here are some “biggies” from over the years:
—A local paper ran a page one story on how one of its reporters, covering a drug raid, was kidnapped and held hostage. Not true; it was a fabrication.
—At the same paper, a columnist wrote a piece on two famous professional basketball players attending a college championship game and cheering for their school. Not true; a fabrication. They weren’t even at the game. In an apology, the columnist wrote he made an “assumption,” more commonly known as a lie.
—Another local paper, when space flight was still covered, ran a piece on a lift-off, describing it as beautiful. Not true; a fabrication. The flight had been scrubbed.
Even the Pulitzer Prize Committee doesn’t fact-check. It once awarded its prestigious prize to Janet Leslie Cooke, of The Washington Post, for a story she had manufactured, on an 8-year-old heroin addict. (She admitted her guilt and returned the prize.)
In my decades in this business, I have been involved in dozens of stories that contained errors, some minor, some serious. Two stand out: in the first, almost every major “fact” was wrong; the second, broadcast by a local TV station, was downright dishonest.
There are exceptions to fact-checking in the mainstream media. Some weekly and monthly academic journals and even news magazines employ fact-checkers. They can do so because they do not have unforgiving deadlines nor do they deal with the volume of the mainstream media.
These publications have the time to fact-check and doing so enhances their reputations. But they are not flawless either. (For instance, Rolling Stone was found guilty of defamation for a story of an alleged gang rape that turned out to be false.)
So, while these “controversies” whet the appetites of the media, let’s save our outrage for more important causes. There is no shortage of them. And that’s a fact.
————————
Berl Falbaum is a veteran journalist and author of 12 books.
It seems like the mainstream media is in the news as much these days as the people and events they cover.
First, within the last couple of weeks, we had Ann Telnaes, an editorial cartoonist resigning from The Washington Post, because she was offended when the paper rejected a cartoon that mocked the paper’s owner, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon. As I recently wrote, she gave the word “chutzpah” (Jewish for gall, audacity) an entirely new meaning.
Now come two new controversies. One involves The New York Times rejecting an advertisement and the other, Mark Zuckerberg, Meta CEO, ending fact-checking on Facebook, Instagram, and other Meta platforms.
We’ll deal with The Times case first. The American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), a Quaker organization, wanted to place an ad in the paper, calling for an end to Israel’s “genocide” in Gaza.
The Times refused the ad, suggesting that AFSC change “genocide” to “war” because, the paper said, “Various international bodies, human rights organizations and governments have different views on the situation. In line with our commitment to factual accuracy and adherence to legal standards, we must ensure that all advertising content complies with these widely applied definitions.”
AFSC huffed and puffed in a press release, asking: “Why is it not acceptable to publicize the meticulously documented atrocities committed by Israel and paid for by the United States?”
The answer: It is perfectly acceptable to publicize what AFSC considers Israel’s abuses in the war with Hamas, but The Times has no obligation — legal or otherwise — to provide the organization with a platform.
The Times is a private enterprise and like all media institutions makes literally thousands of decisions daily on what to publish, where to publish articles (page one or deep in the paper), or not to publish at all. And those decisions include advertisements.
Years ago, I had a go-around with the student newspaper at Brandeis University, a Jewish institution, when it published a Holocaust denier ad. The paper cited “freedom of the press” as its defense and I responded, the Holocaust deniers have a constitutional right to their views but the paper did not have to help them disseminate them.
The 10 words in the First Amendment devoted to freedom of the press — “Congress shall make no law respecting…freedom of the press…” — are designed to protect the press from government intervention. The remaining 35 words deal with freedom of religion, the right to assembly, and to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Under the guarantee of a free press, private organizations can make their decisions and as long as they don’t engage in libel or other violations (copyright infringements, invasion of privacy, etc.) they do not owe anyone an explanation.
I am going to guess that AFSC has a newsletter or magazine and that it would not publish an ad or article that defends Israel. And I support that right.
One more point: Press freedom applies to everyone not just media institutions. Even protesters distributing flyers at political rallies enjoy that protection.
(I thank my valued friend, former Detroit Congressman William Brodhead, for reminding me of that point after my column on Telnaes.)
Now, to Meta and fact-checking. Zuckerberg created a brouhaha with his announcement to end that practice. First, an admission: I am computer illiterate when it comes to social media. I have never Facebooked,
Headbooked, Toebooked, Instagrammed, Tweeted, Tiked or Toked. When my grandchildren ask me to text them, I seek help from the 4-year-old next door.
When the headlines screamed, “Meta Ends Fact-Checking,” I reacted with puzzlement. So what? Why? There are 1,279 daily newspapers and 5,147 weeklies in the U.S. (Source: Wikipedia) and I feel safe to say, none has any fact-checkers.
I understand that the mainstream media has filtering processes to assure accuracy while the social media does not. The latter is more like an international Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner (London) where anyone can hold forth and, agreed, extremely powerful in the internet era.
It is impossible to check the thousands of stories published by daily papers and, of course, do so in the few minutes before publication. Each organization would have to create duplicate staffs just to recheck all the facts in stories and if all the quotes were accurate. Simply not possible. Editors have no choice but to trust that their writers are reporting accurately. (And, overall, they perform admirably.)
Here is what the Columbia Journalism Review has said on fact-checking: “…[I]t is virtually impossible to rigorously report the day’s news, edit a story, and then hand it over to a fact-checker to be verified in time to print a paper the next day—or an article the next hour.”
When I was teaching journalism courses at Wayne State University, one of my standard assignments was for students to fact-check published stories. They were, at times, appalled by what they found. Here are some “biggies” from over the years:
—A local paper ran a page one story on how one of its reporters, covering a drug raid, was kidnapped and held hostage. Not true; it was a fabrication.
—At the same paper, a columnist wrote a piece on two famous professional basketball players attending a college championship game and cheering for their school. Not true; a fabrication. They weren’t even at the game. In an apology, the columnist wrote he made an “assumption,” more commonly known as a lie.
—Another local paper, when space flight was still covered, ran a piece on a lift-off, describing it as beautiful. Not true; a fabrication. The flight had been scrubbed.
Even the Pulitzer Prize Committee doesn’t fact-check. It once awarded its prestigious prize to Janet Leslie Cooke, of The Washington Post, for a story she had manufactured, on an 8-year-old heroin addict. (She admitted her guilt and returned the prize.)
In my decades in this business, I have been involved in dozens of stories that contained errors, some minor, some serious. Two stand out: in the first, almost every major “fact” was wrong; the second, broadcast by a local TV station, was downright dishonest.
There are exceptions to fact-checking in the mainstream media. Some weekly and monthly academic journals and even news magazines employ fact-checkers. They can do so because they do not have unforgiving deadlines nor do they deal with the volume of the mainstream media.
These publications have the time to fact-check and doing so enhances their reputations. But they are not flawless either. (For instance, Rolling Stone was found guilty of defamation for a story of an alleged gang rape that turned out to be false.)
So, while these “controversies” whet the appetites of the media, let’s save our outrage for more important causes. There is no shortage of them. And that’s a fact.
————————
Berl Falbaum is a veteran journalist and author of 12 books.
COMMENTARY: The ‘bare minimum’ amount comes into play every 4 years
January 24 ,2025
Everyone has heard the expression “the bare minimum,” but did you know it can be applied to child support as well?
:
By Marie E. Matyjaszek
Everyone has heard the expression “the bare minimum,” but did you know it can be applied to child support as well?
The Michigan Child Support Formula (MCSF) is updated every four years, with 2025 being the kickoff to a new manual. Changes will be discussed in later articles, but I’d like to mention this often-overlooked section.
If you are opted into the Friend of the Court (FOC) system, you are eligible for a child support review every 36 months or sooner if circumstances change. While this list is not exhaustive, examples of changes are the birth of another child, job loss or gain, raises, incapacitation, and incarceration. If you are one of the lucky ones where nothing has caused you to adjust support in three years, the FOC should contact you to inquire if you want a review; depending on the answers, one will be started.
The volume of support review requests received by the FOC and courts is large, and the outcomes may not be what the parties were hoping for when they began the process. People often think that every raise and every overnight have a big impact on what is being paid in support. However, depending on what the change is, and how it fits into the support algorithm, it may not make a dent in the formula recommended amount.
The 2025 MCSF Section 4.05 covers the minimum threshold for modification of child support. Those “bare minimums” are 10 percent of the currently ordered support amount, or $50 per month, whichever is greater. So, if you’re paying $450 per month in support, and the new recommended amount is $460, the bare minimum has not been met and support will stay the same. But if support is recommended to be $125, you’ve hit the jackpot, and the threshold has been met.
You can agree to modify support under the threshold amount and enter a new order, but it’s very unlikely the court would grant a modification that doesn’t meet the threshold without the parties’ agreement. If the FOC child support review exceeds the minimum threshold, the FOC must request a modification of the current order.
If your FOC review results in a letter telling you that the recommended amount did not meet the minimum threshold, now you know what that means. You can object to the review even if the threshold amount is not met, just like you could if a modification was recommended.
Before you ask for a support review, use the MiChildSupport Calculator, which can be accessed online at: https://micase.state.mi.us/calculatorapp/public/welcome/load.html, to get an idea as to whether your $2 raise or health care premium increase will move the needle. Doing the bare minimum can have a lasting effect on your resources and frustration level.
————————
Marie E. Matyjaszek is a Judicial Attorney at the Washtenaw County Trial Court; however, the views expressed in this column are her own. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Everyone has heard the expression “the bare minimum,” but did you know it can be applied to child support as well?
The Michigan Child Support Formula (MCSF) is updated every four years, with 2025 being the kickoff to a new manual. Changes will be discussed in later articles, but I’d like to mention this often-overlooked section.
If you are opted into the Friend of the Court (FOC) system, you are eligible for a child support review every 36 months or sooner if circumstances change. While this list is not exhaustive, examples of changes are the birth of another child, job loss or gain, raises, incapacitation, and incarceration. If you are one of the lucky ones where nothing has caused you to adjust support in three years, the FOC should contact you to inquire if you want a review; depending on the answers, one will be started.
The volume of support review requests received by the FOC and courts is large, and the outcomes may not be what the parties were hoping for when they began the process. People often think that every raise and every overnight have a big impact on what is being paid in support. However, depending on what the change is, and how it fits into the support algorithm, it may not make a dent in the formula recommended amount.
The 2025 MCSF Section 4.05 covers the minimum threshold for modification of child support. Those “bare minimums” are 10 percent of the currently ordered support amount, or $50 per month, whichever is greater. So, if you’re paying $450 per month in support, and the new recommended amount is $460, the bare minimum has not been met and support will stay the same. But if support is recommended to be $125, you’ve hit the jackpot, and the threshold has been met.
You can agree to modify support under the threshold amount and enter a new order, but it’s very unlikely the court would grant a modification that doesn’t meet the threshold without the parties’ agreement. If the FOC child support review exceeds the minimum threshold, the FOC must request a modification of the current order.
If your FOC review results in a letter telling you that the recommended amount did not meet the minimum threshold, now you know what that means. You can object to the review even if the threshold amount is not met, just like you could if a modification was recommended.
Before you ask for a support review, use the MiChildSupport Calculator, which can be accessed online at: https://micase.state.mi.us/calculatorapp/public/welcome/load.html, to get an idea as to whether your $2 raise or health care premium increase will move the needle. Doing the bare minimum can have a lasting effect on your resources and frustration level.
————————
Marie E. Matyjaszek is a Judicial Attorney at the Washtenaw County Trial Court; however, the views expressed in this column are her own. She can be reached by e-mailing her at matyjasz@hotmail.com.
Legal People ...
January 17 ,2025
Three local Butzel attorneys have been elected shareholders. Shanika A. Owens, Blake C. Padget, and Blaine A. Veldhuis are newly elected shareholders.
:
Three local Butzel attorneys have been elected shareholders. Shanika A. Owens, Blake C. Padget, and Blaine A. Veldhuis are newly elected shareholders.
Owens, based in Butzel’s Detroit office, focuses her practice on helping clients navigate mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and real estate law. Her experience includes a wide range of transactions in a variety of industries.
In 2022, Owens, along with her colleagues, represented the seller in an acquisition worth more than $400 million. She and the team received the 2023 Association for Corporate Growth (ACG) Detroit Chapter’s M&A Deal of the Year award in recognition of their legal expertise in navigating the transaction.
Based in Butzel’s Troy office, Padget concentrates his practice on labor and employment law. He is part of Butzel’s employment litigation team defending employers in cases involving claims of discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination. He also has experience counseling clients on employment law issues such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) interactive process and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In addition to spending several years in private practice, Padget has experience working in-house on labor and employment matters for one of Detroit’s largest employers.
Padget has helped counsel clients on rapidly developing employee issues such as employee complaints and discipline. He has responded to charges from administrative agencies, including the EEOC, MDCR, and NLRB.
Veldhuis, based in Butzel’s Troy office, focuses his practice on defending wage and hour claims, discrimination claims, sexual harassment claims, whistleblower claims, commercial litigation, and general employment litigation. He counsels employers in employee relations and discipline and discharge matters, and also assists employers in drafting employment policies and in complying with the federal and state employment laws. Veldhuis also focuses on the defense of complex ERISA litigation and single plaintiff ERISA cases.
Veldhuis has experience representing defendants and respondents in administrative and governmental investigations, including Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of Labor audits, and investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Michigan Department of Civil Rights, and the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
In addition, Butzel attorney Geaneen M. Arends is among attorneys named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s 2024 ‘Michigan Go To Lawyers’ Power List. She is recognized in the category of business transactions.
Based in the firm’s Detroit office, Arends is a Butzel vice president and serves on the firm’s Board of Directors. She also serves as chair of the firm’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee. Arends is a business attorney with more than 25 years of experience in mergers & acquisitions and commercial real estate transactions.
She assists businesses with entity formation and maintenance, general business contracts, equity and asset sales, and minority-owned business certification. Arends has been lead counsel or significantly involved in domestic and international M&A transactions in a variety of sectors, including the automotive and professional service industries. She also advises businesses on a variety of real estate transactions, including financing, acquisition, disposition, development and leasing of multi-family residential, retail, office and industrial properties throughout the United States.
Arends is an alumna of Leadership Detroit, Class XXVII. She serves on the Board of Directors of the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit PBS, and Detroit Legal News Co. (DTRL) U.S.: OTC and is a member of the Real Property Law Advisory Board for the Institute of Continuing Legal Education. She also is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation and the Detroit Bar Association and its foundation.
Arends has been honored by Best Lawyers in America® - Real Estate Law, 2025; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Black Business Leaders, 2024; 2021 Diversity Business Leader Honoree by Corp! Magazine; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Executives in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, 2021; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Woman Attorney, 2017; M&A Advisor - Cross-Border M&A Deal of the Year (over $50MM – $100MM), 2016; Association for Corporate Growth, Detroit - All Star Deal of the Year Over $50 Million, 2015; Michigan Lawyers Weekly - Women in the Law, 2014; and, DBusiness Top Lawyers in Metro Detroit, Nonprofits/Charities Law, 2014; Corporate Law, 2018 & 2022, 2023; Real Estate Law, 2014, 2017, 2018, 2020-2023; Mergers & Acquisitions Law, 2018, 2020.
Arends is a graduate of Michigan State University (B.A., History, 1994) and of Boston College Law School (1998). She is admitted to the State Bar of Michigan and the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.
• • •
Warner Norcross + Judd LLP announced two Detroit-area attorneys have been named partners.
The new partners are John C. Muhs and Michael A. Stone. Muhs is based in Detroit, and Stone is based in Macomb County. Both are members of the State Bar of Michigan.
Muhs is a transactional attorney who specializes in securities and investment matters. He is a member of the firm’s industry-leading impact investing group, where he works with community development financial institutions, church extension funds, charitable loan funds and other organizations to finance community development activities.
Muhs has been recognized on Best Lawyers® Detroit: Ones to Watch List since 2021. He serves as board secretary of Detroit Phoenix Center and is a member of Opportunity Finance Network, Denominational Investors & Loan Administrators and the Michigan Venture Capital Association.
Muhs earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a law degree from the University of Michigan Law School.
Stone chairs the firm’s aerospace and defense industry group and specializes in government contracting, drawing on his military career to enable organizations to take full advantage of commercial opportunities. Stone brings diverse skills and experience to his practice being a former litigator, corporate general counsel, and major general of the U.S. Army.
He currently serves on numerous community, military and veterans service boards.
Stone earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Detroit Mercy, a law degree from Michigan State University College of Law, and a master’s degree from the U.S. Army War College.
• • •
The Michigan Supreme Court (MSC) has appointed Executive Court Administrator Frank Hardester, of the Third Circuit Court in Wayne County, to the Michigan Judicial Council (MJC) through a recent administrative order. Hardester’s appointment fills one of four slots on the MJC designated for trial court administrators and is for a full term that began January 1 and ends December 31, 2027.
The MJC is charged with making recommendations to the Michigan Supreme Court on matters pertinent to the administration of justice, including developing a strategic agenda for the judicial branch and suggesting proposals that would enhance the work of all courts.
Hardester has nearly 30 years of experience working in public service, including 27 years in the courts, and has worked in the Third Circuit Court since June 2023. He previously served as court administrator in the 36th Circuit Court in Van Buren County. A graduate of Western Michigan University, Hardester has held leadership positions in several industry and professional organizations, including president of the Michigan Association of Circuit Court Administrators, member of the Foreign Language Board of Review through an appointment by the MSC, and director on the board of the National Association for Court Management.
“I am thankful for Chief Judge Patricia Perez Fresard allowing me to dedicate time to this endeavor,” said Hardester. “I am also very honored to join the Michigan Judicial Council and contribute my expertise to the important work of advancing the Council’s strategic vision for the judiciary. I look forward to collaborating with my colleagues to enhance access to justice and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our courts for those we serve.”
Since its inception in April 2021, the MJC has outlined a strategic planning process, identified its mission and vision statements, and long-range goals for the judicial branch. In 2023, the MJC established workgroups under its Strategic Agenda to implement its Operational Plan. Reports and recommendations can be found on the Michigan Judicial Council webpage at www.courts.michigan.gov/administration/special-initiatives/mjc.
• • •
Jones Day has announced that 37 lawyers were admitted to its partnership effective January 1, including two lawyers in Detroit.
The new partners in Detroit are Andrew J. Clopton and Kurt A. Johnson, both with the Issues & Appeals practice group. Clopton is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School, obtaining his law degree in 2015. Johnson is a graduate of the U-M Law School, earning his law degree in 2015.
• • •
Bodman PLC is pleased to announce that Daniel J. Canine and Jessica D. VanWert have rejoined the firm’s Banking and Finance Practice Group and will launch an equipment and trade finance practice.
Canine and VanWert are veteran banking and finance attorneys with experience negotiating and structuring equipment lease finance transactions. Both join as members of Bodman based in the Troy office.
Canine concentrates his practice in the structuring, negotiation, documentation, and closing of equipment and trade finance transactions. He represents banks and equipment finance companies on equipment loan and lease originations, lease and loan acquisitions, and sales and remarketing of off lease equipment. He also represents banks and equipment finance companies in connection with establishing financing, vendor and referral programs, and developing standard equipment finance documentation.
Canine is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School and received his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University’s James Madison College. He began his legal career with Bodman in 2000. Over the last 25 years, he has practiced at Bodman and held in house roles, including at Macquarie Equipment Finance and most recently at Mitsubishi HC Capital America, Inc. where he served as executive vice president and general counsel. He is a legal instructor for the Certified Lease & Finance Professional (CLFP) Foundation.
VanWert concentrates her practice in representing equipment finance companies in negotiating and structuring equipment finance and leasing transactions. She counsels banks and equipment finance companies in all stages of loan and leasing originations, including review, preparation and negotiation of loan documents and leases, collateral documents and other ancillary documents, and corporate authority and organizational documents. She also represents banks and equipment finance companies in connection with lease and loan acquisitions, development of financing, vendor and referral programs, and workout and restructuring of lease and loan transactions.
VanWert is a graduate of Indiana University School of Law and received her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan. She began her legal career at Bodman in 2007. She left the firm in 2017 to serve in-house roles, including in-house counsel for one of the nation’s largest all-digital bank and industry-leading auto financing businesses and, most recently, as general counsel for a leading equipment leasing solutions provider that specializes in acquiring equipment for clients in the construction and industrial, healthcare, IT solutions and services, material handling and automation, and renewable energy and solar sectors.
Bodman is also pleased to announce that Arti Batra joined the firm as a member in the High Net Worth Practice Group.
Batra, who is based in the firm’s Detroit office, counsels high net worth individuals, multigenerational families, and blended families on estate planning, charitable giving, retirement planning, planning for incapacity and disability, asset protection, business succession planning, and trust administration.
Before joining Bodman, Batra worked at a public accounting firm based in Seattle where she counseled clients and their professional advisors on ways to minimize estate, gift and generation skipping transfer taxes. She also served as a senior estate planner and vice president for a wealth management, capital markets, asset management and private equity firm as part of its wealth planning team.
Batra also founded and operated her own law firm in Southfield where she established an estate planning practice that was largely concentrated on estate planning, estate administration, business succession planning, and tax planning for high net worth clients.
Batra is a graduate of Wayne State University Law School and received undergraduate and Master of Public Health degrees from the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master of Laws degree in Taxation from Villanova University Charles Wridger School of Law.
• • •
Attorney Jeffrey G. Schultz has joined the litigation practice of Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC in Southfield. Schultz concentrates his practice on personal injury and insurance defense
matters. He has experience in a variety of civil defense fields including construction litigation, first and third-party auto liability, workers’ compensation defense, and premises liability.
Schultz received his law degree from Wayne State University Law School.
• • •
McDonald Hopkins is proud to announce the recognition of several attorneys recognized by Leading Lawyers.
The following local attorneys have received the recognition of Leading Lawyers for 2025:
James J. Boutrous II—Employment Law: Employee, Employment Law: Management, Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition Law
James Giszczak—Data Privacy, Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition Law
Patrick A. Karbowski—Land Use, Zoning & Condemnation Law, Real Estate Law: Commercial, Real Estate Law: Finance
Antoinette Pilzner—Tax Law: Business
Miriam Rosen—Employment Law: Management
Michael P. Witzke—Elder Law, Trust, Will & Estate Planning Law
• • •
Varnum is proud to announce that Louis F. Ronayne and Jacob R. Whately have been promoted to partner.
Ronayne is based in the firm’s Novi office and is a member of the Litigation Team. He represents clients in a range of business and commercial litigation matters, including high-stakes disputes involving temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. He has experience in litigating contracts and business torts, including non-compete, UCC, and fraud cases, real estate matters, and construction disputes. In addition, Ronayne is an experienced appellate advocate.
Whately is a member of Varnum’s Corporate Team. Based in the firm’s Birmingham office, he focuses on mergers and acquisitions and also advises clients on general corporate matters, including business formations, restructurings and dissolutions, contract drafting and negotiations, terms and conditions analysis, disputes with customers and suppliers, nondisclosure agreements and corporate governance. Whately is also a member of the Venture Capital and Emerging Companies specialty area and advises emerging companies on capital fundraising, including SAFE financing, preferred equity financing and securities law compliance.
• • •
Miller Canfield is proud to announce that Elizabeth Baker and Christopher Dutot, attorneys in the firm’s immigration practice, have been named the recipients of the 2024 Richard J. Seryak Award for Outstanding Pro Bono and Community Service.
Baker and Dutot exemplify the values celebrated by the Seryak Award through their commitment to pro bono service, particularly in the Road to Restoration driver’s license restoration clinics. This public-private partnership, which includes the Michigan Secretary of State’s Office, DTE Energy, United Way, and the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, has helped nearly 10,000 Michigan residents regain their driving privileges.
Established in 2015, the Seryak Award honors the extraordinary legacy of Richard J. “Dick” Seryak, a leading employment lawyer and litigator at Miller Canfield for nearly 40 years. Seryak was committed to ensuring that individuals without resources could access the legal assistance they needed, setting a standard for client service, professional excellence, and dedication to pro bono and community service.
• • •
Plunkett Cooney partner Glenn C. Ross was recently named to the 2025 Class of Go To Lawyers for Commercial Real Estate as determined by Michigan Lawyers Weekly (MiLW).
A member of Plunkett Cooney’s Business Transactions & Planning Practice Group in the Bloomfield Hills office, Ross has nearly 15 years of experience representing clients in numerous aspects of general corporate law, business and commercial matters, and mergers and acquisitions, as well as in transactions related to complex financing. He provides counsel and advice regarding a variety of financing sources for real estate projects and business transactions, including the use of tax credits, conventional construction and permanent financing loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, 221(d)(4) and 221(f) FHA loans, HOME funds, private activity bonds and other federal, state and local financing sources.
A 2011 graduate of Wayne State University Law School, Ross is a member of the State Bar of Michigan. He received his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University in 2005.
• • •
Brooks Kushman is proud to announce that Reza Roghani Esfahani, Fanqi Meng, and Dustin Zak have been promoted to shareholder through election by their peers.
Esfahani is an intellectual property attorney at Brooks Kushman, specializing in patent and trade secret litigation across a range of technologies, including mechanical, chemical, and computer sciences. She is also a member of the firm’s post-grant practice group, with extensive experience representing clients in Inter Partes Review proceedings. Esfahani’s experience includes representing clients in high-stakes litigation, such as his key role in the successful defense of Ford Motor Company in Versata Software v. Ford Motor Company, where the team reduced a $1.4 billion damages claim to just $3 in nominal damages. With a technical background in chemical engineering, Esfahani brings an understanding of complex technologies to his legal practice, ensuring clients receive effective and strategic IP representation.
Meng is an intellectual property attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution and litigation in the electrical arts and computer systems. His practice also includes free and open-source software compliance and review. Meng has experience in preparing and prosecuting patent applications on a variety of technologies, including electronics, computers, and automotive-related arts. In addition, he has been involved in several patent dispute negotiations and settlements. Prior to joining Brooks Kushman, Meng spent three years working as a patent practitioner in Beijing, China, conducting various patent practices. With this international background, Meng works with a diverse range of clients from various parts of the world, including the US, EU, Greater China Region, Japan, and South Korea. He also has experience drafting patent applications and responses to office actions, as well as conducting various patent practices in computer systems and electronics.
Zak is a registered patent attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution, online enforcement, and litigation. He possesses a range of technical experience, from chemical and material arts to software applications and artificial intelligence. Zak has managed many of his clients’ patent portfolios to protect and advance their key products and technologies. He also has experience with online enforcement of his clients’ intellectual property, such as on Amazon.com. Zak has played roles in the success of his clients as both plaintiffs and defendants in patent litigation. His role in patent prosecution, online enforcement, and patent litigation gives him a unique perspective to provide valuable insight into litigation strategies and protecting his clients’ technologies.
In addition, Brooks Kushman is proud to announce that eighteen of the firm’s lawyers were named “Leading Lawyers for 2025” by Leading Lawyers Magazine. The Leading Lawyers for 2025 include:
Sangeeta Shah
Matthew Jakubowski
Michael Brodbine
Robyn Lederman
Molly Crandall
Marc Lorelli
Mark Cantor
William Abbatt
Frank Angileri
Erin Bowles
John Halan
Jeffrey Szuma
William Conger
Kevin Heinl
Elizabeth Janda
James Kushman
Thomas Lewry
Robert Tuttle
Owens, based in Butzel’s Detroit office, focuses her practice on helping clients navigate mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and real estate law. Her experience includes a wide range of transactions in a variety of industries.
In 2022, Owens, along with her colleagues, represented the seller in an acquisition worth more than $400 million. She and the team received the 2023 Association for Corporate Growth (ACG) Detroit Chapter’s M&A Deal of the Year award in recognition of their legal expertise in navigating the transaction.
Based in Butzel’s Troy office, Padget concentrates his practice on labor and employment law. He is part of Butzel’s employment litigation team defending employers in cases involving claims of discrimination, harassment, and wrongful termination. He also has experience counseling clients on employment law issues such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) interactive process and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In addition to spending several years in private practice, Padget has experience working in-house on labor and employment matters for one of Detroit’s largest employers.
Padget has helped counsel clients on rapidly developing employee issues such as employee complaints and discipline. He has responded to charges from administrative agencies, including the EEOC, MDCR, and NLRB.
Veldhuis, based in Butzel’s Troy office, focuses his practice on defending wage and hour claims, discrimination claims, sexual harassment claims, whistleblower claims, commercial litigation, and general employment litigation. He counsels employers in employee relations and discipline and discharge matters, and also assists employers in drafting employment policies and in complying with the federal and state employment laws. Veldhuis also focuses on the defense of complex ERISA litigation and single plaintiff ERISA cases.
Veldhuis has experience representing defendants and respondents in administrative and governmental investigations, including Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of Labor audits, and investigations conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Michigan Department of Civil Rights, and the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs.
In addition, Butzel attorney Geaneen M. Arends is among attorneys named to Michigan Lawyers Weekly’s 2024 ‘Michigan Go To Lawyers’ Power List. She is recognized in the category of business transactions.
Based in the firm’s Detroit office, Arends is a Butzel vice president and serves on the firm’s Board of Directors. She also serves as chair of the firm’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee. Arends is a business attorney with more than 25 years of experience in mergers & acquisitions and commercial real estate transactions.
She assists businesses with entity formation and maintenance, general business contracts, equity and asset sales, and minority-owned business certification. Arends has been lead counsel or significantly involved in domestic and international M&A transactions in a variety of sectors, including the automotive and professional service industries. She also advises businesses on a variety of real estate transactions, including financing, acquisition, disposition, development and leasing of multi-family residential, retail, office and industrial properties throughout the United States.
Arends is an alumna of Leadership Detroit, Class XXVII. She serves on the Board of Directors of the Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit PBS, and Detroit Legal News Co. (DTRL) U.S.: OTC and is a member of the Real Property Law Advisory Board for the Institute of Continuing Legal Education. She also is a Fellow of the American Bar Foundation and the Detroit Bar Association and its foundation.
Arends has been honored by Best Lawyers in America® - Real Estate Law, 2025; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Black Business Leaders, 2024; 2021 Diversity Business Leader Honoree by Corp! Magazine; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Executives in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, 2021; Crain’s Detroit Business - Notable Woman Attorney, 2017; M&A Advisor - Cross-Border M&A Deal of the Year (over $50MM – $100MM), 2016; Association for Corporate Growth, Detroit - All Star Deal of the Year Over $50 Million, 2015; Michigan Lawyers Weekly - Women in the Law, 2014; and, DBusiness Top Lawyers in Metro Detroit, Nonprofits/Charities Law, 2014; Corporate Law, 2018 & 2022, 2023; Real Estate Law, 2014, 2017, 2018, 2020-2023; Mergers & Acquisitions Law, 2018, 2020.
Arends is a graduate of Michigan State University (B.A., History, 1994) and of Boston College Law School (1998). She is admitted to the State Bar of Michigan and the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan.
• • •
Warner Norcross + Judd LLP announced two Detroit-area attorneys have been named partners.
The new partners are John C. Muhs and Michael A. Stone. Muhs is based in Detroit, and Stone is based in Macomb County. Both are members of the State Bar of Michigan.
Muhs is a transactional attorney who specializes in securities and investment matters. He is a member of the firm’s industry-leading impact investing group, where he works with community development financial institutions, church extension funds, charitable loan funds and other organizations to finance community development activities.
Muhs has been recognized on Best Lawyers® Detroit: Ones to Watch List since 2021. He serves as board secretary of Detroit Phoenix Center and is a member of Opportunity Finance Network, Denominational Investors & Loan Administrators and the Michigan Venture Capital Association.
Muhs earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a law degree from the University of Michigan Law School.
Stone chairs the firm’s aerospace and defense industry group and specializes in government contracting, drawing on his military career to enable organizations to take full advantage of commercial opportunities. Stone brings diverse skills and experience to his practice being a former litigator, corporate general counsel, and major general of the U.S. Army.
He currently serves on numerous community, military and veterans service boards.
Stone earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Detroit Mercy, a law degree from Michigan State University College of Law, and a master’s degree from the U.S. Army War College.
• • •
The Michigan Supreme Court (MSC) has appointed Executive Court Administrator Frank Hardester, of the Third Circuit Court in Wayne County, to the Michigan Judicial Council (MJC) through a recent administrative order. Hardester’s appointment fills one of four slots on the MJC designated for trial court administrators and is for a full term that began January 1 and ends December 31, 2027.
The MJC is charged with making recommendations to the Michigan Supreme Court on matters pertinent to the administration of justice, including developing a strategic agenda for the judicial branch and suggesting proposals that would enhance the work of all courts.
Hardester has nearly 30 years of experience working in public service, including 27 years in the courts, and has worked in the Third Circuit Court since June 2023. He previously served as court administrator in the 36th Circuit Court in Van Buren County. A graduate of Western Michigan University, Hardester has held leadership positions in several industry and professional organizations, including president of the Michigan Association of Circuit Court Administrators, member of the Foreign Language Board of Review through an appointment by the MSC, and director on the board of the National Association for Court Management.
“I am thankful for Chief Judge Patricia Perez Fresard allowing me to dedicate time to this endeavor,” said Hardester. “I am also very honored to join the Michigan Judicial Council and contribute my expertise to the important work of advancing the Council’s strategic vision for the judiciary. I look forward to collaborating with my colleagues to enhance access to justice and improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our courts for those we serve.”
Since its inception in April 2021, the MJC has outlined a strategic planning process, identified its mission and vision statements, and long-range goals for the judicial branch. In 2023, the MJC established workgroups under its Strategic Agenda to implement its Operational Plan. Reports and recommendations can be found on the Michigan Judicial Council webpage at www.courts.michigan.gov/administration/special-initiatives/mjc.
• • •
Jones Day has announced that 37 lawyers were admitted to its partnership effective January 1, including two lawyers in Detroit.
The new partners in Detroit are Andrew J. Clopton and Kurt A. Johnson, both with the Issues & Appeals practice group. Clopton is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School, obtaining his law degree in 2015. Johnson is a graduate of the U-M Law School, earning his law degree in 2015.
• • •
Bodman PLC is pleased to announce that Daniel J. Canine and Jessica D. VanWert have rejoined the firm’s Banking and Finance Practice Group and will launch an equipment and trade finance practice.
Canine and VanWert are veteran banking and finance attorneys with experience negotiating and structuring equipment lease finance transactions. Both join as members of Bodman based in the Troy office.
Canine concentrates his practice in the structuring, negotiation, documentation, and closing of equipment and trade finance transactions. He represents banks and equipment finance companies on equipment loan and lease originations, lease and loan acquisitions, and sales and remarketing of off lease equipment. He also represents banks and equipment finance companies in connection with establishing financing, vendor and referral programs, and developing standard equipment finance documentation.
Canine is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School and received his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University’s James Madison College. He began his legal career with Bodman in 2000. Over the last 25 years, he has practiced at Bodman and held in house roles, including at Macquarie Equipment Finance and most recently at Mitsubishi HC Capital America, Inc. where he served as executive vice president and general counsel. He is a legal instructor for the Certified Lease & Finance Professional (CLFP) Foundation.
VanWert concentrates her practice in representing equipment finance companies in negotiating and structuring equipment finance and leasing transactions. She counsels banks and equipment finance companies in all stages of loan and leasing originations, including review, preparation and negotiation of loan documents and leases, collateral documents and other ancillary documents, and corporate authority and organizational documents. She also represents banks and equipment finance companies in connection with lease and loan acquisitions, development of financing, vendor and referral programs, and workout and restructuring of lease and loan transactions.
VanWert is a graduate of Indiana University School of Law and received her undergraduate degree from the University of Michigan. She began her legal career at Bodman in 2007. She left the firm in 2017 to serve in-house roles, including in-house counsel for one of the nation’s largest all-digital bank and industry-leading auto financing businesses and, most recently, as general counsel for a leading equipment leasing solutions provider that specializes in acquiring equipment for clients in the construction and industrial, healthcare, IT solutions and services, material handling and automation, and renewable energy and solar sectors.
Bodman is also pleased to announce that Arti Batra joined the firm as a member in the High Net Worth Practice Group.
Batra, who is based in the firm’s Detroit office, counsels high net worth individuals, multigenerational families, and blended families on estate planning, charitable giving, retirement planning, planning for incapacity and disability, asset protection, business succession planning, and trust administration.
Before joining Bodman, Batra worked at a public accounting firm based in Seattle where she counseled clients and their professional advisors on ways to minimize estate, gift and generation skipping transfer taxes. She also served as a senior estate planner and vice president for a wealth management, capital markets, asset management and private equity firm as part of its wealth planning team.
Batra also founded and operated her own law firm in Southfield where she established an estate planning practice that was largely concentrated on estate planning, estate administration, business succession planning, and tax planning for high net worth clients.
Batra is a graduate of Wayne State University Law School and received undergraduate and Master of Public Health degrees from the University of Michigan. She also earned a Master of Laws degree in Taxation from Villanova University Charles Wridger School of Law.
• • •
Attorney Jeffrey G. Schultz has joined the litigation practice of Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC in Southfield. Schultz concentrates his practice on personal injury and insurance defense
matters. He has experience in a variety of civil defense fields including construction litigation, first and third-party auto liability, workers’ compensation defense, and premises liability.
Schultz received his law degree from Wayne State University Law School.
• • •
McDonald Hopkins is proud to announce the recognition of several attorneys recognized by Leading Lawyers.
The following local attorneys have received the recognition of Leading Lawyers for 2025:
James J. Boutrous II—Employment Law: Employee, Employment Law: Management, Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition Law
James Giszczak—Data Privacy, Trade Secrets/Unfair Competition Law
Patrick A. Karbowski—Land Use, Zoning & Condemnation Law, Real Estate Law: Commercial, Real Estate Law: Finance
Antoinette Pilzner—Tax Law: Business
Miriam Rosen—Employment Law: Management
Michael P. Witzke—Elder Law, Trust, Will & Estate Planning Law
• • •
Varnum is proud to announce that Louis F. Ronayne and Jacob R. Whately have been promoted to partner.
Ronayne is based in the firm’s Novi office and is a member of the Litigation Team. He represents clients in a range of business and commercial litigation matters, including high-stakes disputes involving temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. He has experience in litigating contracts and business torts, including non-compete, UCC, and fraud cases, real estate matters, and construction disputes. In addition, Ronayne is an experienced appellate advocate.
Whately is a member of Varnum’s Corporate Team. Based in the firm’s Birmingham office, he focuses on mergers and acquisitions and also advises clients on general corporate matters, including business formations, restructurings and dissolutions, contract drafting and negotiations, terms and conditions analysis, disputes with customers and suppliers, nondisclosure agreements and corporate governance. Whately is also a member of the Venture Capital and Emerging Companies specialty area and advises emerging companies on capital fundraising, including SAFE financing, preferred equity financing and securities law compliance.
• • •
Miller Canfield is proud to announce that Elizabeth Baker and Christopher Dutot, attorneys in the firm’s immigration practice, have been named the recipients of the 2024 Richard J. Seryak Award for Outstanding Pro Bono and Community Service.
Baker and Dutot exemplify the values celebrated by the Seryak Award through their commitment to pro bono service, particularly in the Road to Restoration driver’s license restoration clinics. This public-private partnership, which includes the Michigan Secretary of State’s Office, DTE Energy, United Way, and the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, has helped nearly 10,000 Michigan residents regain their driving privileges.
Established in 2015, the Seryak Award honors the extraordinary legacy of Richard J. “Dick” Seryak, a leading employment lawyer and litigator at Miller Canfield for nearly 40 years. Seryak was committed to ensuring that individuals without resources could access the legal assistance they needed, setting a standard for client service, professional excellence, and dedication to pro bono and community service.
• • •
Plunkett Cooney partner Glenn C. Ross was recently named to the 2025 Class of Go To Lawyers for Commercial Real Estate as determined by Michigan Lawyers Weekly (MiLW).
A member of Plunkett Cooney’s Business Transactions & Planning Practice Group in the Bloomfield Hills office, Ross has nearly 15 years of experience representing clients in numerous aspects of general corporate law, business and commercial matters, and mergers and acquisitions, as well as in transactions related to complex financing. He provides counsel and advice regarding a variety of financing sources for real estate projects and business transactions, including the use of tax credits, conventional construction and permanent financing loans, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans, 221(d)(4) and 221(f) FHA loans, HOME funds, private activity bonds and other federal, state and local financing sources.
A 2011 graduate of Wayne State University Law School, Ross is a member of the State Bar of Michigan. He received his undergraduate degree from Michigan State University in 2005.
• • •
Brooks Kushman is proud to announce that Reza Roghani Esfahani, Fanqi Meng, and Dustin Zak have been promoted to shareholder through election by their peers.
Esfahani is an intellectual property attorney at Brooks Kushman, specializing in patent and trade secret litigation across a range of technologies, including mechanical, chemical, and computer sciences. She is also a member of the firm’s post-grant practice group, with extensive experience representing clients in Inter Partes Review proceedings. Esfahani’s experience includes representing clients in high-stakes litigation, such as his key role in the successful defense of Ford Motor Company in Versata Software v. Ford Motor Company, where the team reduced a $1.4 billion damages claim to just $3 in nominal damages. With a technical background in chemical engineering, Esfahani brings an understanding of complex technologies to his legal practice, ensuring clients receive effective and strategic IP representation.
Meng is an intellectual property attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution and litigation in the electrical arts and computer systems. His practice also includes free and open-source software compliance and review. Meng has experience in preparing and prosecuting patent applications on a variety of technologies, including electronics, computers, and automotive-related arts. In addition, he has been involved in several patent dispute negotiations and settlements. Prior to joining Brooks Kushman, Meng spent three years working as a patent practitioner in Beijing, China, conducting various patent practices. With this international background, Meng works with a diverse range of clients from various parts of the world, including the US, EU, Greater China Region, Japan, and South Korea. He also has experience drafting patent applications and responses to office actions, as well as conducting various patent practices in computer systems and electronics.
Zak is a registered patent attorney who focuses his practice on patent prosecution, online enforcement, and litigation. He possesses a range of technical experience, from chemical and material arts to software applications and artificial intelligence. Zak has managed many of his clients’ patent portfolios to protect and advance their key products and technologies. He also has experience with online enforcement of his clients’ intellectual property, such as on Amazon.com. Zak has played roles in the success of his clients as both plaintiffs and defendants in patent litigation. His role in patent prosecution, online enforcement, and patent litigation gives him a unique perspective to provide valuable insight into litigation strategies and protecting his clients’ technologies.
In addition, Brooks Kushman is proud to announce that eighteen of the firm’s lawyers were named “Leading Lawyers for 2025” by Leading Lawyers Magazine. The Leading Lawyers for 2025 include:
Sangeeta Shah
Matthew Jakubowski
Michael Brodbine
Robyn Lederman
Molly Crandall
Marc Lorelli
Mark Cantor
William Abbatt
Frank Angileri
Erin Bowles
John Halan
Jeffrey Szuma
William Conger
Kevin Heinl
Elizabeth Janda
James Kushman
Thomas Lewry
Robert Tuttle
COMMENTARY: Understanding the 363 bankruptcy sale: High-value opportunities for strategic investors
January 17 ,2025
Store ClosingIn the high-stakes
world of corporate finance, a 363 bankruptcy sale can be a game changer.
This powerful legal mechanism has enabled renowned companies including
General Motors, Hertz and Neiman Marcus to navigate existential
financial threats and emerge from the reorganization process as much
leaner, stronger businesses:
:
By Scott H. Hogan
Store ClosingIn the high-stakes world of corporate finance, a 363 bankruptcy sale can be a game changer. This powerful legal mechanism has enabled renowned companies including General Motors, Hertz and Neiman Marcus to navigate existential financial threats and emerge from the reorganization process as much leaner, stronger businesses:
• GM leveraged a 363 sale to offload its entire European operation and other under-performing parts of the company. This allowed the auto giant to focus on the North American market and return to profitability.
• Hertz utilized a 363 sale to streamline its business model, selling off non-core assets and emerging with a more competitive market strategy.
• Neiman Marcus, the luxury department store, went through a 363 sale, shedding significant debt and focusing on revitalizing the classic brand.
These high-visibility success stories highlight the company-saving, transformative potential of 363 sales, which can offer a lifeline to the most distressed companies and provide high-value, low-cost opportunities for savvy investors.
Alternatively, it doesn’t always work out. Borders Bookstores, RadioShack and Toys “R” Us also conducted 363 sales -- with vastly different outcomes. All three of these fabled retailers are essentially out-of-business today.
How Does a 363 Bankruptcy Sale Work?
The process begins when a debtor files for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The debtor then sells off assets, reorganizes its finances and endeavors to continue operations. While 363 sales are more commonly part of Chapter 11 proceedings, 363 sales can be utilized in a Chapter 7 liquidation.
• Asset Identification – The debtor company identifies the assets to be sold at the 363 sale. Qualified appraisers or experts value those assets.
• Court Approval – The debtor files a legal motion with the bankruptcy court seeking its approval to sell the identified assets in a 363 sale. The motion also seeks court approval to select a “stalking horse” bidder, whose bid will serve as a baseline asking price for the debtor’s assets.
• The “Stalking Horse” Bidder – Debtors participating in a 363 sale will often select a “stalking horse” (literally: a horse that leads wild horses into a trap) bidder, which will enter an opening, baseline bid on the assets being sold. There are significant potential upsides for a stalking horse bidder, including first mover advantage, potential discounts, negotiation leverage with the debtor and the guarantee of a fair and transparent process overseen by the bankruptcy court.
• Marketing and Sale of Assets – The debtor markets and auctions the identified assets in a process which includes notifying potential bidders of the sale, providing detailed information about the assets for sale, hosting pre-auction inspections/tours and conducting the auction. Potential bidders invited to participate in the sale include companies, investors, financial institutions or other asset acquirers.
• Closing the Deal – The highest bidder(s) are awarded the assets, which are free and clear of liens and encumbrances. However, the bankruptcy court reserves the right to approve or deny the sale or portions or it.
Advantages of Participating in a 363 Bankruptcy Sale
• Attractive Pricing/High Value – The primary benefit of taking part in a 363 sale is the opportunity it provides for participants to acquire large lots of corporate assets at prices well below current market values. Debtors in bankruptcy sales are motivated to sell quickly, which can be a powerful advantage for qualified asset buyers.
• Speed and Efficiency – The 363 bankruptcy sale, designed to be an expedited process, can offer a unique opportunity for companies to strategically acquire assets and integrate them with their operations in a fraction of the time (60-90 days on average) needed for traditional asset acquisition and integration.
• Free and Clear Title – The assets acquired at a 363 sale are transferred to the buyer free and clear of any title liens or encumbrances, offering another layer of risk reduction.
• Court Oversight – The rigid oversight of the bankruptcy court guarantees that a 363 sale will be organized, transparent and fair for all. Because the court oversees the process and reserves the right to review the transaction, buyers can be relatively assured that the sale will be conducted in a manner that adheres to legal standards.
Potential Problems for 363 Sale Participants
• Due Diligence Challenges – While the speed of a 363 sale is one of its advantages, it can also be a drawback. The relatively short span of time required for a 363 sale can greatly limit the amount of time for potential buyers to conduct due diligence, increasing the risk of unforeseen, future liabilities. Caveat emptor.
• Competing Bids, Changing Market Conditions, Regulatory Hurdles, Etc. – Most 363 sales proceed smoothly with predictable outcomes, but that’s not always the case. Changing market conditions, higher numbers of motivated bidders, fluctuating asset valuations, secured creditor objections, legal and copyright disputes, unexpected regulatory hurdles and other factors (even breaking news) can sometimes make for a 363 sale that is quite dynamic, spirited and unpredictable.
• Financing Difficulties – The securing of financing for assets to be purchased in a 363 sale can be problematic. Given the distressed situation of the assets, unknown potential liabilities related to assets for sale and the short timeline of the process, some lenders may take a cautious approach and impose more stringent terms.
• Court Approvals Required – Despite the expedited process of 363 bankruptcy sale, it is still a federal court proceeding and the requirements for review, approvals and delays due to legal challenges or objections from creditors could slow the closing process.
Conclusion: A 363 Bankruptcy Sale Can be Significant
Growth Opportunity, but Proceed with Caution
A 363 bankruptcy sale can present a significant opportunity for select businesses -- including mid-sized operations – to acquire valuable assets at below-market prices. In addition, it’s guaranteed to be a fair and transparent proceeding overseen by the court with all purchased assets free and clear of encumbrances and liens.
As noted, the 363 sale can present its own set of risks and challenges, including the need for swift due diligence and the possibility that bidding for the assets will become competitive and aggressive.
But with a studied and organized approach, which includes consulting with specialized legal and financial advisors, businesses can successfully navigate the complexities of a 363 sale and complete a transformative, cost-efficient acquisition in a short period of time.
————————
Scott H. Hogan is a shareholder with Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC.
Store ClosingIn the high-stakes world of corporate finance, a 363 bankruptcy sale can be a game changer. This powerful legal mechanism has enabled renowned companies including General Motors, Hertz and Neiman Marcus to navigate existential financial threats and emerge from the reorganization process as much leaner, stronger businesses:
• GM leveraged a 363 sale to offload its entire European operation and other under-performing parts of the company. This allowed the auto giant to focus on the North American market and return to profitability.
• Hertz utilized a 363 sale to streamline its business model, selling off non-core assets and emerging with a more competitive market strategy.
• Neiman Marcus, the luxury department store, went through a 363 sale, shedding significant debt and focusing on revitalizing the classic brand.
These high-visibility success stories highlight the company-saving, transformative potential of 363 sales, which can offer a lifeline to the most distressed companies and provide high-value, low-cost opportunities for savvy investors.
Alternatively, it doesn’t always work out. Borders Bookstores, RadioShack and Toys “R” Us also conducted 363 sales -- with vastly different outcomes. All three of these fabled retailers are essentially out-of-business today.
How Does a 363 Bankruptcy Sale Work?
The process begins when a debtor files for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The debtor then sells off assets, reorganizes its finances and endeavors to continue operations. While 363 sales are more commonly part of Chapter 11 proceedings, 363 sales can be utilized in a Chapter 7 liquidation.
• Asset Identification – The debtor company identifies the assets to be sold at the 363 sale. Qualified appraisers or experts value those assets.
• Court Approval – The debtor files a legal motion with the bankruptcy court seeking its approval to sell the identified assets in a 363 sale. The motion also seeks court approval to select a “stalking horse” bidder, whose bid will serve as a baseline asking price for the debtor’s assets.
• The “Stalking Horse” Bidder – Debtors participating in a 363 sale will often select a “stalking horse” (literally: a horse that leads wild horses into a trap) bidder, which will enter an opening, baseline bid on the assets being sold. There are significant potential upsides for a stalking horse bidder, including first mover advantage, potential discounts, negotiation leverage with the debtor and the guarantee of a fair and transparent process overseen by the bankruptcy court.
• Marketing and Sale of Assets – The debtor markets and auctions the identified assets in a process which includes notifying potential bidders of the sale, providing detailed information about the assets for sale, hosting pre-auction inspections/tours and conducting the auction. Potential bidders invited to participate in the sale include companies, investors, financial institutions or other asset acquirers.
• Closing the Deal – The highest bidder(s) are awarded the assets, which are free and clear of liens and encumbrances. However, the bankruptcy court reserves the right to approve or deny the sale or portions or it.
Advantages of Participating in a 363 Bankruptcy Sale
• Attractive Pricing/High Value – The primary benefit of taking part in a 363 sale is the opportunity it provides for participants to acquire large lots of corporate assets at prices well below current market values. Debtors in bankruptcy sales are motivated to sell quickly, which can be a powerful advantage for qualified asset buyers.
• Speed and Efficiency – The 363 bankruptcy sale, designed to be an expedited process, can offer a unique opportunity for companies to strategically acquire assets and integrate them with their operations in a fraction of the time (60-90 days on average) needed for traditional asset acquisition and integration.
• Free and Clear Title – The assets acquired at a 363 sale are transferred to the buyer free and clear of any title liens or encumbrances, offering another layer of risk reduction.
• Court Oversight – The rigid oversight of the bankruptcy court guarantees that a 363 sale will be organized, transparent and fair for all. Because the court oversees the process and reserves the right to review the transaction, buyers can be relatively assured that the sale will be conducted in a manner that adheres to legal standards.
Potential Problems for 363 Sale Participants
• Due Diligence Challenges – While the speed of a 363 sale is one of its advantages, it can also be a drawback. The relatively short span of time required for a 363 sale can greatly limit the amount of time for potential buyers to conduct due diligence, increasing the risk of unforeseen, future liabilities. Caveat emptor.
• Competing Bids, Changing Market Conditions, Regulatory Hurdles, Etc. – Most 363 sales proceed smoothly with predictable outcomes, but that’s not always the case. Changing market conditions, higher numbers of motivated bidders, fluctuating asset valuations, secured creditor objections, legal and copyright disputes, unexpected regulatory hurdles and other factors (even breaking news) can sometimes make for a 363 sale that is quite dynamic, spirited and unpredictable.
• Financing Difficulties – The securing of financing for assets to be purchased in a 363 sale can be problematic. Given the distressed situation of the assets, unknown potential liabilities related to assets for sale and the short timeline of the process, some lenders may take a cautious approach and impose more stringent terms.
• Court Approvals Required – Despite the expedited process of 363 bankruptcy sale, it is still a federal court proceeding and the requirements for review, approvals and delays due to legal challenges or objections from creditors could slow the closing process.
Conclusion: A 363 Bankruptcy Sale Can be Significant
Growth Opportunity, but Proceed with Caution
A 363 bankruptcy sale can present a significant opportunity for select businesses -- including mid-sized operations – to acquire valuable assets at below-market prices. In addition, it’s guaranteed to be a fair and transparent proceeding overseen by the court with all purchased assets free and clear of encumbrances and liens.
As noted, the 363 sale can present its own set of risks and challenges, including the need for swift due diligence and the possibility that bidding for the assets will become competitive and aggressive.
But with a studied and organized approach, which includes consulting with specialized legal and financial advisors, businesses can successfully navigate the complexities of a 363 sale and complete a transformative, cost-efficient acquisition in a short period of time.
————————
Scott H. Hogan is a shareholder with Foster, Swift, Collins, & Smith PC.
COMMENTARY: Washington Post cartoonist bites the hand that feeds her ego
January 17 ,2025
While the First Amendment offers
constitutional protection for freedom of the press, it does not do so
for chutzpah (the Jewish word for audacity, impudence or shamelessness).
:
By Berl Falbaum
While the First Amendment offers constitutional protection for freedom of the press, it does not do so for chutzpah (the Jewish word for audacity, impudence or shamelessness).
Someone should tell that to Ann Telnaes, the editorial cartoonist at The Washington Post, who last week resigned in a huff after the paper refused to publish one of her cartoons.
That cartoon, which she published on Substack, a newsletter format, showed powerful billionaires kneeling in front of a statue of President-elect Donald Trump while offering him sacks of moolah.
Oh, one more “minor” fact: Among the billionaires? Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon who just happens to be the owner of The Post — the top dog at the paper.
Yes, you read that right. Telnaes is complaining about suppression of “freedom of the press” because she was not allowed to mock her boss in his own paper, the one who provides her with a good salary, health insurance, and helps pay for other of her financial needs.
Also, depicted in the cartoon were Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong — and a prostrate Mickey Mouse who apparently represents the Walt Disney Company.
Telnaes touches on her duplicity when she writes in her resignation statement: “There will be some people who say, ‘Hey, you work for a company and that company has a right to expect employees to adhere to what’s good for the company.’”
But she adds, “that’s true except we’re talking about news organizations that have public obligations and who are obliged to nurture a free press in a democracy…” and not try to “get in the good graces of an autocrat-in-waiting [that] will only result in undermining that free press.”
There is so much to dissect in that statement that one does not know where to begin, but we’ll give it a shot.
First, need we point out that Bezos should not expect to be ridiculed in the paper he owns. (It was awkward even having to write that sentence.) Carried to its logical conclusion, had Telnaes showed even more contempt for Bezos in a cartoon, would she have asked him for a raise?
Question: Would any Telnaes supporters reading this column mock their bosses publicly and cite freedom of speech as a defense? I did not think so.
Interestingly, there were no reports that she might have been fired, forcing her to resign. Thus, The Post might even be commended for being open-minded and showing commendable toleration.
Second, David Shipley, The Post’s opinion editor, said the cartoon was not killed because of its content but because it was repetitive of other material published on the same subject. But let us assume the cartoon was rejected because of the political message.
Bezos has every right to decide the politics of The Post that he and the paper will express on its editorial pages. Telnaes doesn’t have to agree, of course, and can seek employment elsewhere.
I have mentioned a personal experience in a previous column in which I described being vetted as an editorial writer by a paper on the West Coast. After a four-day trial, it was all too clear that the paper and I were as far apart on political views as possible. It did not offer the job and I would not have accepted had I received one.
I had no reason to complain. The owners have every right to seek and hire writers that shared its views and fire those that would not articulate its politics.
Editorials and political commentary need to be judged differently than news stories. If Telnaes were complaining that a news story she wrote was spiked for political reasons, she would have a case because news is supposed to be free from political judgments. News stories are touted to be public as being “objective” subject to no political considerations.
Killing a news story or slanting facts would undermine that pledge and while not a violation of “freedom of the press” that Telnaes cites in her case, it would be highly unethical, poisoning hallowed journalistic principles. In those circumstances, she would be justified in resigning and even doing so in the klieg lights which apparently was one of her objectives.
In a sense, by publishing the cartoon on Substack (along with her resignation statement), she stole from The Post since it was drawn while being paid by Bezos. The paper owns the drawing. But I don’t want to be petty. So, as they instruct jurors in a courtroom, I ask readers to disregard this paragraph.
Third, perhaps Bezos is reaching out to Trump to protect The Post and try to blunt Trump’s anti-media agenda and paranoia. He might have decided that it was better to try and work with
Trump in protecting freedom of the press rather than fight him.
We don’t know Bezos’s motivation and we don’t even know if Bezos was involved in spiking the carton. Bezos might very well fail in efforts, but he may have concluded it was worth a try.
Most important: Bezos must not make any concessions to Trump in the coverage of his administration.
Joe Scarborough, and his wife, Mika Brzezinski, co- hosts of “Morning Joe,” and Bret Stephens, an opinion columnist at The New York Times, already have sold out by making peace with Trump after criticizing him for nine years.
Let’s hope those precedents do not repeat themselves. But the Telnaes “controversy” is not in that ballpark. Apparently, blinded by her ego, she thought the First Amendment was designed to protect you even when biting the hand that feeds you.
I expect that in upcoming job interviews, she will be asked if she will promise not to skewer her bosses or the owner of her future employer.
————————
Berl Falbaum is a veteran journalist and author of 12 books.
While the First Amendment offers constitutional protection for freedom of the press, it does not do so for chutzpah (the Jewish word for audacity, impudence or shamelessness).
Someone should tell that to Ann Telnaes, the editorial cartoonist at The Washington Post, who last week resigned in a huff after the paper refused to publish one of her cartoons.
That cartoon, which she published on Substack, a newsletter format, showed powerful billionaires kneeling in front of a statue of President-elect Donald Trump while offering him sacks of moolah.
Oh, one more “minor” fact: Among the billionaires? Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon who just happens to be the owner of The Post — the top dog at the paper.
Yes, you read that right. Telnaes is complaining about suppression of “freedom of the press” because she was not allowed to mock her boss in his own paper, the one who provides her with a good salary, health insurance, and helps pay for other of her financial needs.
Also, depicted in the cartoon were Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Los Angeles Times owner Patrick Soon-Shiong — and a prostrate Mickey Mouse who apparently represents the Walt Disney Company.
Telnaes touches on her duplicity when she writes in her resignation statement: “There will be some people who say, ‘Hey, you work for a company and that company has a right to expect employees to adhere to what’s good for the company.’”
But she adds, “that’s true except we’re talking about news organizations that have public obligations and who are obliged to nurture a free press in a democracy…” and not try to “get in the good graces of an autocrat-in-waiting [that] will only result in undermining that free press.”
There is so much to dissect in that statement that one does not know where to begin, but we’ll give it a shot.
First, need we point out that Bezos should not expect to be ridiculed in the paper he owns. (It was awkward even having to write that sentence.) Carried to its logical conclusion, had Telnaes showed even more contempt for Bezos in a cartoon, would she have asked him for a raise?
Question: Would any Telnaes supporters reading this column mock their bosses publicly and cite freedom of speech as a defense? I did not think so.
Interestingly, there were no reports that she might have been fired, forcing her to resign. Thus, The Post might even be commended for being open-minded and showing commendable toleration.
Second, David Shipley, The Post’s opinion editor, said the cartoon was not killed because of its content but because it was repetitive of other material published on the same subject. But let us assume the cartoon was rejected because of the political message.
Bezos has every right to decide the politics of The Post that he and the paper will express on its editorial pages. Telnaes doesn’t have to agree, of course, and can seek employment elsewhere.
I have mentioned a personal experience in a previous column in which I described being vetted as an editorial writer by a paper on the West Coast. After a four-day trial, it was all too clear that the paper and I were as far apart on political views as possible. It did not offer the job and I would not have accepted had I received one.
I had no reason to complain. The owners have every right to seek and hire writers that shared its views and fire those that would not articulate its politics.
Editorials and political commentary need to be judged differently than news stories. If Telnaes were complaining that a news story she wrote was spiked for political reasons, she would have a case because news is supposed to be free from political judgments. News stories are touted to be public as being “objective” subject to no political considerations.
Killing a news story or slanting facts would undermine that pledge and while not a violation of “freedom of the press” that Telnaes cites in her case, it would be highly unethical, poisoning hallowed journalistic principles. In those circumstances, she would be justified in resigning and even doing so in the klieg lights which apparently was one of her objectives.
In a sense, by publishing the cartoon on Substack (along with her resignation statement), she stole from The Post since it was drawn while being paid by Bezos. The paper owns the drawing. But I don’t want to be petty. So, as they instruct jurors in a courtroom, I ask readers to disregard this paragraph.
Third, perhaps Bezos is reaching out to Trump to protect The Post and try to blunt Trump’s anti-media agenda and paranoia. He might have decided that it was better to try and work with
Trump in protecting freedom of the press rather than fight him.
We don’t know Bezos’s motivation and we don’t even know if Bezos was involved in spiking the carton. Bezos might very well fail in efforts, but he may have concluded it was worth a try.
Most important: Bezos must not make any concessions to Trump in the coverage of his administration.
Joe Scarborough, and his wife, Mika Brzezinski, co- hosts of “Morning Joe,” and Bret Stephens, an opinion columnist at The New York Times, already have sold out by making peace with Trump after criticizing him for nine years.
Let’s hope those precedents do not repeat themselves. But the Telnaes “controversy” is not in that ballpark. Apparently, blinded by her ego, she thought the First Amendment was designed to protect you even when biting the hand that feeds you.
I expect that in upcoming job interviews, she will be asked if she will promise not to skewer her bosses or the owner of her future employer.
————————
Berl Falbaum is a veteran journalist and author of 12 books.
headlines Macomb
- WLAM members celebrate the season
- Governor signs bills expanding reproductive freedom, reducing barriers to affording contraception and care in Michigan
- Diversity, equity concerns top ABA meeting January 29-February 3 in Phoenix
- Supreme Court rejects Republican-backed Montana case based on controversial election law theory
- Nessel urges human trafficking awareness during Detroit Auto Show
headlines National
- ABA calls on senators to oppose ‘deeply concerning’ immigration bill
- SCOTUSblog founder Tom Goldstein faces tax evasion charges
- Stanford Law prof fires Meta as client, citing platform’s ‘descent into toxic masculinity’
- Most lawyers aren’t using AI to address growing workloads, new report says
- US law firms make gains in UK’s mergers market
- Managers, supervisors must return to office, district attorney in Oregon county says
