- Posted March 27, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
U.S. court: Judges can rule on passport law
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court said Monday that the federal courts are eminently capable of judging a law that would allow Jerusalem-born Americans to list Israel as their birthplace on their U.S. passport.
The justices, in an 8-1 judgment, overturned a lower court ruling that said the judiciary could not get involved in a political fight mixing Middle Eastern politics with a dispute between Congress and the president.
"The courts are fully capable of determining whether this statute may be given effect, or instead must be struck down in light of authority conferred on the executive by the Constitution," said Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote the majority opinion.
But because the lower courts never actually ruled on the merits of the law giving Americans born in Jerusalem the right to have Israel listed as their birthplace -- only that judges should not get involved -- Roberts said the high court did not have enough facts to determine the law's constitutionality.
"Ours is a court of final review and not first view," said Roberts, who sent the case back down to the lower courts for rehearing.
The parents of Jerusalem-born Menachem Zivotofsky sued the State Department after it wouldn't issue the boy a passport showing he was born in Israel. The United States has refused to recognize any nation's sovereignty over Jerusalem since Israel's creation in 1948.
Justice Stephen Breyer was the only dissenter on the court, saying there is a "serious risk" that judicial "intervention will bring about 'embarrassment.'"
Published: Tue, Mar 27, 2012
headlines Detroit
- Michigan Law professor receives Educator Award from State Bar
- Black Moms and Pregnant Women Forced Out of Their Homes in Metro Detroit Face Health and Safety Threats
- Recent ‘letter’ begs a number of very troubling questions, concerns
- Dearborn defends itself against accusations of favoring Muslim holidays over other faiths
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




