- Posted May 03, 2012
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Nebraska Justice Dept.: Dismiss suit over contraception
By Grant Schulte
Associated Press
LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- The U.S. Justice Department is asking a judge to dismiss a lawsuit filed by several states that challenges a new federal health care rule that requires contraception coverage for employees of church-affiliated hospitals, schools and outreach programs.
Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who is leading the suit, scoffed at the request Tuesday, noting that the department has pushed the rule's enforcement deadline to next year -- after the November elections -- and hasn't detailed how it plans in the meantime to address religious groups' concerns.
"Regardless of the continuous promises of change offered by this administration, the results are nothing more than bait and switch," the Republican, who is running for U.S. Senate, said.
Department lawyers argued for the lawsuit's dismissal in court papers filed late Monday, noting that they have agreed not to enforce the rule until August 2013 and have promised to work with religious groups.
The lawsuit alleges that the new rule violates the First Amendment rights of groups that object to the use of contraceptives.
It was filed in U.S. District Court of Nebraska by Bruning and his fellow GOP attorneys general from Florida, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas. Three Nebraska-based groups -- Catholic Social Services, Pius X Catholic High School and the Catholic Mutual Relief Society of America -- are also plaintiffs, as are a nun and a female missionary.
The rule was announced as part of the federal health care law -- and came under fire in February from religious groups that object to the use of contraceptives, sterilization and abortion-inducing drugs. In response to the criticism, President Barack Obama's administration has said it would shift the requirement from the employers to health insurers themselves.
The lawsuit alleges that the rule will effectively force religious employers and organizations to drop health insurance coverage, which will raise enrollment in state Medicaid programs and increase patient numbers at state-subsidized hospitals and medical centers. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is named as a defendant.
In court papers, Justice Department lawyers said the groups have failed to show that they face the immediate threat of having to offer the coverage. They said delaying the enforcement provides a "safe harbor" for concerned religious groups while the rules are being changed, and the department will grandfather in many existing coverage plans.
Published: Thu, May 3, 2012
headlines Detroit
- Cox, Schuette call out Savit for potential ‘ethics issues’
- In Texas, Ordinary Muslim Religious Practices are Increasingly Being Treated as Political Threats
- COA: Out-of-state insurance policies apply to temporary out-of-state motorists
- AG’s comments may push the boundaries of the nonsensical
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




