MICHIGAMME TOWNSHIP (AP) — Who’s buried in hundreds of unmarked graves at an Upper Peninsula cemetery is a question that has challenged one genealogy enthusiast for 15 years.
About 1,335 people have been buried in unmarked graves at Lakeview Cemetery over the past century and a half, according to Renee Saari of Michigamme.
“Everyone deserves to be remembered,” she told The Mining Journal of Marquette.
And so, she went to work in 2000 to track down the names of those buried in the cemetery.
About a dozen members of the Michigamme Historical Society’s Lakeview Cemetery Committee have joined the project.
So far, they’ve used death certificates, obituaries and burial permits to identify about 300 people, and they know the grave sites of about 50.
The cemetery is in Marquette County’s Michigamme Township, about 35 miles west of Marquette in central upper Michigan.
Many of the people without a headstone died in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and likely couldn’t afford a marker, Saari said.
- Posted June 01, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Woman's quest: Identify 1,335 unmarked graves
headlines Macomb
- Scholarship recipients celebrated
- Eastpointe man sentenced for assault with intent to do great bodily harm in two cases
- Michigan gang member pleads guilty to RICO conspiracy for drug trafficking and over $500,000 in fraud
- Attorney general, senator want to see movement on social media, AI safety bills for minors
- Justice Dept., FTC extend deadline for public comment on guidance on business collaborations
headlines National
- Millions of Americans continue to lack meaningful access to justice. What can be done about it?
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- Federal judge hands down $110K penalty against 2 lawyers for AI errors in court documents
- Former adult film actress passes February bar exam in Texas
- Grad sues George Washington University, Ernst & Young after Gaza ‘genocide’ remarks in commencement speech
- Magicians Penn & Teller file Supreme Court brief questioning use of ‘investigative hypnosis’




