LANSING (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court is wading into a hot legal dispute over how to value big-box stores for tax purposes.
Values lately have been controversial in Michigan, especially in the Upper Peninsula where communities have been forced to give significant tax refunds based on decisions by the Michigan Tax Tribunal.
Escanaba last year successfully argued that the Tribunal used the wrong standard to determine the value of a Menards store.
The Supreme Court has agreed to at least look at whether the state appeals court made the right call when it sent the Escanaba case back to the Tribunal for more work.
The court also wants the parties to submit arguments about the valuation analysis used by the Tribunal.
- Posted February 07, 2017
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State high court looks at big-box tax dispute
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- 250th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- The Burton Book Review: ‘Last Branch Standing: A Potentially Surprising, Occasionally Witty Journey Inside Today’s Supreme Court’
- King Charles’ flyover tribute pauses Supreme Court arguments
- Former judge suspended over Facebook posts seeks relief from SCOTUS
- Trump judicial pick, rated unqualified by the ABA, advances in Senate




