To the Editor:
Gene Esshaki’s “ADR Spotlight” (April 3, 2018) does an excellent job in describing the assistance the use of a special master gives to a judge dealing with complex disputes. Lawyers should also know that similar assistance can be obtained from the appointment of an expert advisor, thus avoiding the formalities mandated by the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53.
As explained in “Appointing Special Masters and Other Judicial Adjuncts,” published by the Academy of Court-Appointed Masters (www.courtappointedmasters.org):
“It has long been considered within a court’s inherent authority to engage the help of an expert advisor. An expert advisor can act as a judicial tutor, providing guidance on complex or specialized subjects. Patent cases and trade secret cases are two contexts in which the need for an expert advisor occasionally arises. When an advisor is utilized, the trial court conducts the trial with support from the advisor.”
Judge Avern Cohn
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of Michigan
- Posted April 13, 2018
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Letter to the Editor
headlines Detroit
- Wayne State University Law School to honor four distinguished alumni and faculty member at 2026 Alumni Wall of Fame ceremony
- Supreme Court aims to increase access for people who cannot afford a lawyer
- Voters had a big win at the Supreme Court this week. What does it all mean?
- Daily Briefs
- Five Michigan Law 3Ls selected for Dow Sustainability Fellowship Program
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder
