SAGINAW (AP) — The Michigan Supreme Court has unanimously ruled in favor of a hospital in a dispute over access to records in a malpractice lawsuit.
The court says lawmakers have shielded so-called peer review records from disclosure. Peer review committees at hospitals review certain practices as a way to improve patient care.
In a 6-0 decision, the court ruled in a case from Saginaw County. A judge had said lawyers could see “objective facts” listed on the first page of a report about the death of a patient, Dorothy Krusac.
But the Supreme Court says Judge Fred Borchard relied on an erroneous decision by the state appeals court in a similar case.
The court says a litigant still can rely on eyewitness testimony and a patient’s medical records.
- Posted April 24, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
State high court rules some hospital records can't be disclosed
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- Federal judge says motion is littered with ‘unnecessary potshots and hyperbole,’ offers chance to refile
- ACLU and BigLaw firm use ‘Orange is the New Black’ in hashtag effort to promote NY jail reform
- How I Made Partner: 'Take Every Opportunity Early On to Try Many Different Practice Areas,' Says Ryan Judd of Turner Padget Graham & Laney
- The 2023 Legalweek Leaders in Tech Law Awards Winners Are Here!
- The morning read for Tuesday, March 21
- Announcement of opinions for Tuesday, March 21