WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says bankruptcy courts have authority to rule on disputes that fall outside the bankruptcy proceedings if the parties to the case consent.
The recent 6-3 ruling helps clarify the power of bankruptcy judges. That had been in question since a 2011 high court decision that limited their authority to decide non-bankruptcy issues.
The case involves efforts by Wellness International Network, Ltd., to recover $655,000 in attorney fees from Richard Sharif, a Chicago resident with whom the company had a legal dispute.
Sharif filed for bankruptcy in 2009 to avoid paying the debt. Wellness claimed Sharif had assets in a family trust that could be tapped and lower courts agreed.
The Supreme Court said lower courts must decide whether Sharif consented to the bankruptcy court deciding the issue.
- Posted June 16, 2015
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Power of bankruptcy judges clarified
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- How Casetext utilized the latest GPT technology to create an AI legal assistant
- Trump motion seeks to block evidence from Georgia special purpose grand jury, disqualify district attorney
- 'I Don't Know How You Have Excellence Without Diversity'—District Judge Orrick III on His Priorities in MDL Leadership Selection
- 2023 Go-To Law Schools: All Schools Data
- Murder in Bronx drug trafficking scheme raises issue of concurrent sentencing
- Court takes up civil rights “tester” case