WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court will decide whether people convicted of crimes but later exonerated can get a refund of court fees and other costs.
The justices said last week they’ll take up a case involving two Colorado defendants assessed thousands of dollars in processing charges and restitution costs after being convicted on sexual assault charges.
Both ultimately had their convictions thrown out on appeal, but a trial court declined to reimburse the money. Shannon Nelson was assessed $8,192 in costs and Louis Alonzo Madden was assessed $4,413.
A Colorado appeals court said state law required a full refund.
But the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that costs could be returned only if they proved their innocence by clear and convincing evidence.
Nelson and Madden say this violates their due process rights.
- Posted October 4, 2016
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Justices take up fight over refunding fees in criminal cases
headlines Macomb
headlines National
- How Casetext utilized the latest GPT technology to create an AI legal assistant
- Trump motion seeks to block evidence from Georgia special purpose grand jury, disqualify district attorney
- Johnson & Johnson Loses Talc Bankruptcy Rehearing, Plans Supreme Court Review
- Federal Judge: Raging Bull Instructor Could Be Liable for Defrauding Consumers $137M in Alleged Investment Scheme
- The morning read for Wednesday, March 22
- Justices appear divided over Navajo Nation’s water rights