- Posted September 06, 2011
- Tweet This | Share on Facebook
Pharmaceutical Astrazeneca's Crestor test backfires
Drugmaker AstraZeneca PLC's big gamble, an attempt to prove its top-selling drug works better than rival cholesterol blockbuster Lipitor, appears to have backfired.
A study meant to show AstraZeneca's cholesterol drug Crestor prevents plaque buildup in heart arteries better than Pfizer Inc.'s Lipitor showed no clear advantage for Crestor.
Two generic versions of Lipitor, the world's top-selling drug for several years, are expected to hit the U.S. market on Nov. 30. Analysts wrote Friday that the study result will make it hard for the British drugmaker to argue patients would fare better on its Crestor than on much-cheaper generic versions of Lipitor.
"The fact that this (AstraZeneca)-funded trial failed to definitively show a benefit in favor of Crestor will add to the negative pressure that Crestor is already destined to face from the imminent launch of generic Lipitor," Bernstein Research analyst Dr. Tim Anderson wrote in a report to investors. "Payers will be able to say that (AstraZeneca) itself has shown in a true head-to-head study, Crestor and Lipitor do about the same thing."
Anderson noted prior studies showing Crestor's benefit only tested it alone or compared it to a dummy pill, rather than another cholesterol medicine.
Jefferies & Co. analyst Jeffrey Holford wrote that the data didn't provide a clear positive result that AstraZeneca could have used to continue arguing Crestor is superior to Lipitor.
Still, he wrote, the positive trend and statistical significance achieved on the secondary goal wasn't a clear negative for Crestor. Holford added that the arrival of generic Lipitor will likely continue Crestor's trend of slow U.S. prescription growth.
Published: Tue, Sep 6, 2011
headlines Detroit
- Department of Corrections disagrees with discrimination charge filed by Civil Rights
- Law firm releases list of the ‘Top 20 Most Dangerous Intersections in Michigan’ for 2025
- ABA amicus brief addresses confidentiality and privilege concerns in border searches of attorneys’ electronic devices
- Here’s what I’ve learned about how medical schools can improve community health
- Daily Briefs
headlines National
- Lindsay Clancy trial shows how hard it is to prove intent retroactively
- Is there a religious right to abortion? State supreme court will weigh in
- Harvey raises $550M in latest round of funding
- Vanderbilt law students will gain access to AI-powered deposition simulations
- Federal judges’ interns may accept stipends from law firms, ethics panel says
- Former lawyer who pulled gun on ex-wife in restaurant convicted of attempted murder




